[wd_asp elements='search' id=11]

The 2003 Constitutional Court precedent summarizing the debate on smoking rights and the reason for not creating a smoking room.

()

The 2003 Constitutional Court precedent summarizing the debate on smoking rights and the reason for not creating a smoking room.


The Constitutional Court’s 2003 Heonma457br Constitutional Court’s right to smoke is higher than the right to smoke. All judges of the Constitutional Court decided on the 7th Article of the National Health Promotion Act, which restricts non-smoking areas to treat all smokers as criminals.According to the principle of higher basic rights, smoking rights should be recognized as long as they do not infringe on smoking rights, Br said. “Smoking is related to public welfare beyond individual private interests.”However, the Constitutional Court continues to reject the idea that brbr hate is a higher basic right than the right to smoke. If you’re interested in brbr, the ruling shows in detail above, and to summarize, brbr, I feel good when I smoke through a public defender, and it’s a history and evidence. So, considering that it is unconstitutional to prohibit smoking anywhere, Article 9 of the Constitution, Article 10 of the succession and development of traditional culture, Article 12 of the right to pursue human dignity and happiness, Article 17 of the freedom of life, Article 34 (1) of human life is a violation!Some summary of the Brbr Constitutional Court’s judgment, brbr, so let’s say that smoking when you want to smoke is 17 trillion and 10 trillion, but the rest of brha 12 trillion, the freedom of the body should not violate individual rights in criminal proceedings. If you agreed that the speaking opinion is ridiculous, we dismiss it. Brbrbr and data from Seoul on the request to increase smoking facilities even though it’s not a constitutional precedent. Brbr, smoking facilities or industrial purification facilities, but smoking rooms have no effect. The issue of expansion is emerging.Br.L.T! How to promote national health!In Article 9 of gt, the smoking room is installed autonomously.How to promote national health!In attached Table 2 of the gt enforcement rules! Smoking room! It stipulates the methods and standards of actual teeth. Based on this, numerous smoking facilities are installed and operated in restaurants, PC rooms, billiards, etc.Br, however, cigarette smoke has a lot of sticky ingredients such as tar, making it almost impossible to purify completely with general purification facilities, and even smoking rooms equipped with negative pressure facilities continue to raise issues, and the World Health Organization’s Framework Convention on Tobacco and the U.S. CDC already stipulate that!br Seoul is carefully promoting various projects, including a 2016 civic debate and a 2017 public offering for smoking facilities installation in order to prepare policies for smoking facilities where smokers and non-smokers can coexist.br, however, in light of cases in developed countries of smoking cessation and WHO’s continued request for demolition of existing smoking facilities, the expansion of pure non-smoking areas without smoking facilities and reduction of smoking rates are the most desirable policies.Brbrbrbr Seoul is not the only city that public policy is like that. Brbr cigarettes can’t escape from secondhand smoke unless they are chewing cigarettes.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Leave a Comment