“”””My student and I went to a hotel for a staycation… Daughter-in-law’s father refutes controversy over inappropriate relationship between husband and husband

According to Yonhap News, Mr. A explained that his former son-in-law demanded 4 billion won worth of money during his daughter’s divorce and even received a court summary order on charges of attempted extortion. According to the data he presented, the former son-in-law was indicted on charges of demanding a large amount of money, including the transfer of shares in an apartment, 5 million won in monthly child support, and 2 billion won in alimony, and was sentenced to a summary order of 3 million won last month.

He said, “The entire 60 million won in alimony in the divorce case was paid the day after the ruling, but there was a separate large claim and a request to give up parental rights to the grandchild, so we were unable to reach an agreement.” In addition, until recently, he claimed, “I was asked for money again, citing media reports and national petitions.”

Mr. A actively denied the suspicion of ‘inappropriate relationship with a student’, which is the core of the controversy. He said, “The school my daughter worked at was not a regular high school, and we all went on ‘hot vacations’ with the students, ordered room service, ate, and played.” He said, “My daughter worked at a social networking service (

SNS

) and the details of conversations about planning a staycation with students were presented.

In addition, regarding the fact that he stayed at a hotel with student B, he even presented the payment details for an extra bed, saying, “I had a university interview scheduled the next day, so I stayed nearby.” He asked, “If it were an affair, would you have written a card notifying your husband and rented a cot?”

‘Costume costume’ and

DNA

As for the results of the appraisal, he said that the ‘costume’ was “something I bought to use with my husband.”

It was claimed that the results of the comparison were “unreliable as it was carried out by a private company a year after the incident.”

https://n.news.naver.com/article/277/0005690140