Filter by Category




State of the judiciary leading the protection of perpetrators.jpg

0
(0)


1 A victim of sexual assault attempted to transfer after changing her name.
2 A 2nd assault on B!Threatening, transferring school name change to a friend at school and !girling.Reynon is changing his identity!Ms. A and Mr. B had a conversation in the group chat room, such as spreading false information and saying, “I want to be reported quickly!” and “No. 6 protective treatment after being reported!” Thus, the prosecution judged that there was no possibility of enlightenment and put it on criminal trial. A week before the
4 sentencing trial, the court dropped the sentence and sent the case to juvenile service. Under the

juvenile law, secondary perpetrators have no criminal records and do not know what kind of punishment they received from the juvenile department.

The prosecution has appealed for now, but if it is disposed of by a juvenile trial before the appeal is accepted, the final ruling will remain in effect.

The perpetrator should be more protected. Victims should be trampled more thoroughly. Because that’s the K-Judiciary.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Leave a Comment