Namu Wiki Hong Min-taek’s document has been taken down.

1:22
aII
94
namu wiki
#13 manticore1317
2025-10-10 18.24.36
[This post is hidden by]
#14 noname
2025-10-11 00.44.42
There are a lot of other comments so I’ll summarize the main points once again.
We give it to you.
All criticisms and discussions written in Namu Wiki’s ‘Hong Min-taek’ document
The revelations made by Kakao Rock executives and employees were posted on Blind.
and; New news, including media coverage of in-house irregularities during the Toss era
It is also based on source v. Perhaps some exaggeration
Even if it contains: Until the truth of 9996
There is no justification for deleting all of them, and after the document is recovered, it is false.
If there really is a truth, it will be verified and discussed.
I think this is correct:
In the case of Katupan, legal issues will be resolved on YouTube, etc.
Yeezy, this is the controversy over CPO Hong and the Kakao Rock update.
This is not a justification for suppressing criticism.
Accordingly, as a contributor to the paper ‘Hong Min-taek’, I objected to the temporary measure.
I raise the frame. This is possible in the hope of recovering the entire document.
We will take full responsibility for all violations: In addition, IP and
I also agree to separate storage of all necessary information, including account name.
Here:
2. Appeal arbitrary action:
nnnr
1 n
that 1’30
5