
image text translation
(Figure 1> Major Party and Representative Shin Hoe -do (unit: point)
4.93
4.56
2.96
3.27
3.03
3.33
2.08
2.30
In addition, Democratic Party Chung Chung -rae
People’s strength
Homeland
fatherland
School
Lee Jun -seok
4.93
Democratic Party
4.45
3.97
4.06
3.24
3.03
3.4
3.46
Homeland
People’s strength
2.96
2.75
2.08
School
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
(Figure 3> The most confident politician among currently active politicians (unit: %, subjective response)
image text translation
Jaemyung Lee
18.6
18
16.9
16.9
16
*Other responses: Seo Young-gyo (1.390),
Na Gyeong-won (1.300), Cho Kuk (1.290),
Minsu Kim (1.200), etc.
‘No] don’t know/
‘Rejected response’ appears as 41.596.
Jeong Cheong-rae
7.6
load force
3.8
Junseok Lee
2.1
Moonsu Kim
Han Dong-hoon
1.6
1.8
0.1
2022
2023
2024
2025
IIIy
Representatives Chung Cheong-rae and Jang Dong-ryeok both started from the National Convention V in August.
image text translation
The presence is revealed. The rigidity of the support layer falls into sharpness.
There is a common denominator in that there is no one who holds party power. CEO Jeong Cheong-rae
The People Power Party was aiming at the possibility of disbanding the political party, and Representative Jang Dong-ryeok was 6.
I am exposed to over-the-counter investing for the first time in years. It is an extreme confrontation. Shin_do score
Reflect that trend. Representative Jeong Cheong-rae is a man in his 50s from Jeolla, Gwangju.
6 points from the local Democratic Party and the Progressive Alliance, supporters of the New Cho Kuk Academic Party
I am receiving the above-mentioned good fortune. Representative Jang Dong-ryeok is the People Power Party.
Only in Jijisong does it appear strong (6.65 points). Both characters are
I am from the Chungcheong area, which is considered a ‘lost boater’. I live in the Daejeon, Sejong, and Chungnam areas.
Representative Seongcheong-rae (4.58 points) was ahead of Representative Jang Dong-ryeok (3.41 points).
In the middle, Daegu, Gyeongbuk, Busan, Ulsan, and Gyeongnam, which have strong conservative tendencies,
The representative of Noonjang Power Company was slightly more dominant with 3.75 and 4.45 points respectively.
(CEO Jeong Cheong-rae scored 3.66 points and 3.44 points).
Respondent 4196, 0 points to Lee Jun-seok
image text translation
The situation is no different for the new school opening. The party’s confidence level was 2.08 points.
It decreased compared to last year. As CEO Lee Jun-seok, he is also facing a crisis.
A total of 41.09 respondents gave ‘0 points’ to CEO Lee Jun-seok.
This means that none of this is reasonable at all. No matter how low the reliability is
Supporters of provincial political parties have a solid ranking of more than 6 points for the party leader.
They are sending Shinhoe V, which Representative Lee obtained from supporters of the New School Opening Party.
There is no credit rating of 5.97. The special prosecutor’s investigation had an impact.
It looks like a robo. Last July, an investigation into suspicions of Myeongtae-gun’s involvement in the nomination was conducted.
Special Prosecutor Kim Geon-hee was the representative of the People Power Party at the time of the nomination meddling incident.
A compulsory investigation was launched as a suspect in the Dawn Group.
When divided by generation and gender, men in their 20s and 30s are Cho Kuk, emergency committee member Jang-ul
image text translation
While the most ‘distrustful’ (2.45 points, 2.37 points), women in their 20s and 30s
CEO Lee Jun-seok is the most ‘distrustful’ (2.89 points, 2.51 points). same age
The tendency for believers to be sharply divided according to gender in the alternative is 2
0The only one in his/her 30s. Jeon Neo Lee; will continue to be
There is a possibility that it will be highlighted as a political front. Cho Kuk emergency committee member
Jang said, “Men in their 20s and 30s show extreme right-wing tendencies similar to those in their 70s.”
Let’s claim ‘2030 male extreme right-wing theory’, CEO Lee Jun-seok
II
A secondary harm to the 2030 generation who may be victims of the Cho Kuk incident.
CEO Lee Jun-seok responded by saying, “We are trying to do this.” CEO Lee Jun-seok said,
Among the respondents, I didn’t get a 1-2 point improvement, but the only one was a man in his 20s.
The performance score was 4.36 points. Emergency committee chairman Cho Kuk is in his 40s and 50s.
The respondent’s confidence level is the highest at 4 points.

image text translation
If you look at the names of the livers, President Lee Jae-myung continues to be the number one soloist.
The sudden exchange between CEO Jeong Cheong-rae and Jang Dong-ryeok is eye-watering.
Both figures had little presence as presidential candidates even a year ago.
It was ugly. In particular, Dong-Hoon Han was mentioned in second place in the same question last year.
Representative Jeon fell to 6th place this year. After the People Power Party presidential election last May
Former representative Han, who lost in the byeong-won election, will run for party representative election in August.
I don’t do it. Rather, Jangdong, which used to be called the core of the pro-friendly group,
The part where Representative Hee overtook the former representative is eye-watering, People Power Party
As a presidential candidate, the presence of former Minister Kim Moon-soo has slightly increased.
In the middle, Rep. Seo Young-kyo of the Democratic Party and Rep. Na Kyung-won of the People’s Power Party join the ranks.
The members of the Legislative Council are not mentioned side by side. Last year, it came in 4th place.
Emergency Situation Committee Chairman Cho Kuk seemed to be on the decline. Apply for a meeting place for Unseokyeol
People Power Party Supreme Council member Kim Min-soo, who caused controversy, was also ranked in the top 10.
Look up.
Request for investigation: 〈Sisa in〉
Research Institution: Korea Gallup Research Institute
Survey date and time: September 14-16, 2025
Survey Target: Men and women over 18 years of age
Survey method: Furniture oil phone RDD and mobile phone RDD in parallel (CATI) -Dual Frame
Response rate: 7.9%(wireless 8.6%, wired 5.1%)
Calculation and application of weights: weighting weight by gender, age, and region (cell weight)
Sample size: 1012
Sample error: ± 3.1% point (95% confidence level)
※ For more information, please refer to the Central Election Review Committee website
https://n.news.naver.com/article/308/0000037305