Garbage turmoil. Politicians have no answer

When 1990
Metropolitan
seoul
During the Nanjido
These guys
Nanjido
Painting angle.
What should I do?
As much as 20 ~ 30 years of use
Select the public site and bury
gyeonggi-do
7-
however
Where do you decide the site
gyeonggi-do
I am a general
I’ll struggle.
As such
Made
Since 1993
Provincial
Trash
Through?
It started.
The end of the landfill is Y!
1995
Incorporated into Geomdan Incheon and landfill map
Going to Incheon
Time
2015
Exaggeration
Guys, the end of the landfill is in front of you ~
From now on
trash
What are you doing?
gyeonggi-do
yet
To bury
The remaining thing
Let’s extend
What are the majority? We are in favor^
Incheon
I’m opposite. ???
But this
Is it democratic?
In the first place, Seo -ol and Gyeonggi -do have no intention of making a landfill separately.
If the landfill ends in 2016, at least the site selection should be cleaned.
Seo Yul and Gyeonggi -do are not even selected
In particular, Seoul is developed and developed.
Virtually us
Site
Extended or
Ranan
Equation 9
Come out
Landfills
I left it and I have your situation, so I’ll extend it until 2025
Instead until 2025
Let’s worry about the site together?
gyeonggi-do
OK Colad
But 2025
Because it’s short
if
Really if
Site
If you can’t
addition
If you can extend it, inside and outside ??
Incheon
What is your conscience ??
Then until 2025
Site
Are you doing your best to decide ??
picture
Only me
I lost money
Benefit
gyeonggi-do
Gla I
So until 2025
Extended
With the agreement framework
Even an additional extension
Agreement
I did it
Instead, Incheon City Landfill
Ownership and
several
I can’t get it.
2017
intake
Worrying
Let’s try it ~ !!
gyeonggi-do
> =
Groan
I’m busy next year
Let’s do it ~
2018
Plus
Groan
intake
Worrying
Let’s try it ~ !!
gyeonggi-do
we
I’m busy, so let’s do it next year ~
2019
Exaggeration
Let’s worry about our landfill ~ !!!
gyeonggi-do
We’re busy, so let’s do it next year ~
2020
Incheon
we
intake
Let’s worry ~ w!
gyeonggi-do
It’s an emergency with Corona right now
I don’t know ??
Do it next year ~
Incheon
Wow ~
Now, 5 years ahead, but still
Site map
If you stabilized
when
Do you make a landfill? It’s an extra extension ??
I’m not doing it too much while I decided to worry together ???
Ha ~
I can’t
2025
2025
Landfill
With the power of Incheon citizens
Voila! We are
New landfill
Sack
Landfills in 2025
End
hi
gyeonggi-do
222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222
Whatever you want
Uh
Incheon
So I believe in the additional extension and who will postpone the child’s day?
We’ll take care of the garbage
Do it for you
And seeing the garbage source
Seoul 4896
Gyeonggi -do 339 Go
We are less than 209
If you have conscience
each
To handle
Right
Is it Yangjil ?? until when
Are you going to do it?
seoul
gyeonggi-do
> =
The Ministry of Environment W!
Ministry of Environment
Now we are reclaiming 2.5 million tons per year, we are until 2026
1.5 million
I’ll reduce it
therefore
Even after 2025
Landfill
???? : A massive amount of disposable garbage caused by the large -scale chain ~
If you go like this
3-1 landfill saturation in 2024 ~
Incheon City Non -Rena Landfill
In 2025,
Ending
As early as 2025, garbage turmoil occurred in Seoul and Gyeonggi -do.
Even if it is an additional extension, it will be the future that will come to one day.
Gyeonggi -do, but there is a selection site as a landfill,
Seoul is a new city that is right
The answer was developed
The situation that does not come out
by mineral oil
management
Benefits
Then
In my house
In tone

Korean economy
PickK
[single]
‘We must prevent the waste crisis’
seoul
City appeals decision to cancel Mapo incinerator
Entered 2025.01.24. 2.27 pm
Modified 2025.01.24. 3.76 pm
Original text of article
Reporter Kwon Yong-hoon
14
155
gaga
[5
It may take ten years to return to the starting point.
Mayor Oh Se-hoon’s appeal hearing is a ‘winner’
Open recruitment of legal representatives next month
A ban on direct landfilling of waste will be implemented starting next year.
Demolition of existing incinerator: Despite 100 billion won in subsidies
Nearby residents unconditionally oppose the construction, making it difficult.
‘Seoul garbage crisis’ confirmed after losing case
We need to send 3,000 tons of cattle to Incheon, Gyeonggi, etc.
Cost in tens of billions
The possibility of consent is unclear