image text translation
Un Sang-hyeon
2 hours
A few days ago, at an emergency meeting of the Supreme Court Justices, the Seoul Western District Court
Regarding the collision incident, “a full-scale commitment to the rule of law
“Negative,” he said. But what was missing was
There is: the fairness of the judiciary.
On the rule of law, on the bias of some judges in the judiciary
It has already been destroyed by:
First, former representative Cho Kuk was sentenced to two years in prison.
I think it will take 5 years to receive it. 3 years for 1st trial
After two months, the second trial court handed down a prison sentence.
Even though they were sentenced, they were not detained by the court, and as a result,
Representative Cho is leading the way for members of the National Assembly to lead the way.
It opens:
Second, Woon Mi-hyang, who was indicted for donations
image text translation
A lawmaker was also elected four years and two months after being indicted.
The sentence of imprisonment without sentence is confirmed. but
It was after I had completed my term as a member of the National Assembly.
Third, during the Moon Jae-in administration, the Blue House’s ‘Ulsan Mayor’
Representative Hang Un-ha, who was indicted for the ‘election interference’ case,
The first trial sentence alone lasted 3 years and 70 months.
There are so many judges from the Korean Law Research Association.
The main case hearing has been ongoing for 15 months.
Because it is not.
Fourth, since the current administration took office, some judges are former Roh Moo-hyun
image text translation
In the case where the president and his wife were indicted as Honorary Wesson
He was suddenly sentenced to six months in prison. but
In the second trial, the sentence is reduced to a fine. however
It turned out that the first trial judge was personally biased.
Political opinions were posted on the Internet several times.
It was a judge. But the Supreme Court told the judge
Only a soft punishment called ‘severe caution’
Inland.
Fifth, the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions enters the National Assembly in 2079,
In relation to the assault on a police officer who damaged property
The court initially ordered Kim Myung-hwan, chairman of the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions, to
There is concern about flight, such as failing to respond to multiple summons.
An arrest warrant was issued on the grounds that
Considering the symbolism of the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions, flight
Only 6 days in detention adjudication due to lack of concern
Only after the release ruling came inland:
Sixth, the trial related to CEO Lee Jae-myung
image text translation
To this extent, since the Constitution was enacted,
It makes you wonder if the trial has ever been delayed:
The next day, the judiciary requested a delay in Representative Lee’s trial.
Because it accepts almost everything: And this
The reason why the representative was able to run in the last presidential election was
A lie told in a TV debate is a false statement.
The Supreme Court’s ruling that it is not
There is no reason:
In addition, the National Assembly will not consent to the arrest of Representative Lee.
Although it is not accepted, the judiciary will receive attention as the party leader.
They say they have no evidence because they are receiving it.
The arrest warrant is dismissed. but
President Un’s arrest warrant has some evidence.
I can’t accept it with just one line. the judiciary
Is it okay to ignore the people like this? at least
There must be fairness in the application of the law
Isn’t it? And at least an explanation as to why
Isn’t that what it should be?
Citizens who went to the judiciary to protest
image text translation
‘The judiciary itself destroyed fairness’
You might get angry when you see it. But that
I have no intention of expressing my anger through violence.
I am against it, but the judiciary and the Democratic Party seem to
They are not responsible for this incident
They covered their faces as if they weren’t there and met violent protesters.
Even unrelated people are denounced as rioters.
I can’t agree with that.
And why are you taking such a serious stance on this situation?
image text translation
Is this something you haven’t applied before? incumbent
They’re going to blow up a truck to arrest the president.
President Un, a protester who marched in Chadoreum,
As soon as I took office, I followed North Korea’s instructions.
The illegal demonstrations of the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions that took place during the resignation demonstrations,
Why is there such a thing as punishment for violent protests?
Are you going to hand down punishment with a soft bat? this
There are countless examples. Do we need to hear them again? already
The judiciary and the Democratic Party ignore the rule of law.
Isn’t it true?
What I hope is that the judiciary will
This is to protect fairness, and the minimum
This is to make sure that faith does not fall:
There is no reason to arrest the sitting president.
In one sentence, it is evidence of some concerns.
If the judiciary believes that it is possible, it will serve the people.
Ignoring:
I sincerely appeal to the judiciary. Fair
image text translation
Demonstrating the true ‘spirit of the rule of law’
This is the way to overcome the current national crisis:
Damn you talk a lot