It was argued that the woman and the man were having an affair while the public petition for the Blue House appeared that the wife, who is a social worker, was sexually assaulted by the representative of the welfare center.On the 22nd, Cheong Wa Dae petitioned.A petition was posted titled “My wife was raped by her boss!”The petitioner, who introduced himself as the husband of social worker A, claimed that his wife had been working as a social worker at the welfare center since November last year, and that the CEO, the son of the head of the welfare center, raped his wife several times and forced her to do similar acts.My wife, who was extremely depressed over the incident, attempted suicide, shocked me and three children who were still in elementary school.My family, which used to be peaceful, quickly became hell.”A person who appears to be the victim of
is in a situation where a controversy over
is spreading as he captures and discloses the contents of the mobile messenger exchanged between
.Mr. Br
B> didn’t want to tell the world about it, but he was forced to post it as a defense.He demanded a large settlement of 400 million won by turning his wife into a victim of sexual assault.”
B> told her husband that she was raped on June 24, and claimed that if she did not give her 400 million won in settlement money to her partner at 00:40 on June 25, she would sue her husband as a sexual offender, calm her down and threaten her marriage.
Released mobile messenger conversation, A will see you tomorrow, honey, I can’t live alone, I like physical affection and I can’t do many things alone,
Office Wife>Bye, see you tomorrow, Office Honey. Drive safely. It contained the contents of the back.
C, who appears to be her husband, appeared and B confessed to my wife since January, and
Wife informed me of this, and I will meet you in person in March!”Don’t touch the married woman, hold her when I put the brake on her,” he said. “You have not stopped since then, and you rebutted your wife who resisted in April for starting to commit atrocities in a narrow car.”The prevailing response is that the case should be watched as the difference between the two sides is large.