I personally don’t think the current MB is neutral.
I’ll talk about this report for several reasons.
The main point of that report was confirmed to have been moved from 12:00 to 17:00 in the
2005 and 2020 power peak time zones, and the reason is presumed to be solar energy. We can realize the power of solar power.It’s
.
1. Power Time Mobile Patterns- Facts- 2. Solar light is the reason- Estimation-3. Solar power is equivalent to four nuclear power plants- argument
1. This is a single fact, so I won’t tell you anything else.
But for number 2, it is an estimate.
Should public broadcaster news estimate it?
If you can’t help it, you have to make an estimate, but you have to do it when it’s limitedly certain.Because news is accepted as a fact by the general public.Then why couldn’t you not make an assumptions?
I don’t think so.
No simple comparison between 05 and 20 years, but close solar power and bidding, and power reserve rates. You can find out by reviewing the solar installation capacity.
The solar light is state-funded, so it is impossible not to know the installation capacity.That estimate may be right or wrong, but the assumption is that I don’t intend to maintain neutrality in the report.The power comparison of
#3 is funny.
If you think the power of nuclear power plants is simple power, MBC reporters understand less about energy power.
Nuclear power plants are the underlying loads themselves, including the stability of electricity production, electricity production, production costs, energy security, etc.
In fact, the current proportion of strategic production of nuclear power plants is not large as it is mid to late 10%.
But as a base load, it’s a lot of power.The sun’s rays… yes. If the sun is good on the panel, it will be powerful.But what else should energy have?
Of course there’s a difference of opinion in power, but that’s not how news reports work.
Clearly intentional and biased.