Filter by Category




Constitutional Court crushes Yoon Seok-yeol’s objection

0
(0)

image text translation

‘Impeachment trial’ first argument
Meteorite objection
What I said dismissing everything
About a judge yesterday
[An application for recusal was received,
except him today
With the unanimous opinion of 7 people
Application for recusal dismissed
second
The designation of the date for the argument is
Article 30, Paragraph 3 of the Current Law Court Act
According to Article 21, Paragraph 1 of the Constitutional Court Judgment Rules,
It’s based on
Criminal Procedure Rules
Nothing has been applied
Because this is the current law court.
Because it’s not a criminal court.
Regarding the presidential impeachment case
I’m going to proceed with the argument.
Isn’t the respondent Seok-yeol Woon coming out?
Article 52 of the Current Law Court Act
[Pursuant to paragraph 1
I will not proceed with the argument.
On the next hearing date
Even if the parties are not present
Article 52 of the Current Court Act
Pursuant to paragraph 2
Argument proceedings are underway
I inform you that it will be

The Justices of the Constitutional Court unanimously gave explanations telling us not to talk nonsense.

And if you don’t appear before the Constitutional Court, the proceedings will proceed as is.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Leave a Comment