The father falsely reported his friend’s father for sexual harassment on the grounds that he was innocent
10-year-old elementary school girl did not play with him thanks to the six-second video that he had been in prison for six months after being arrested. The father, who was reported to be
arrested by the police, was acquitted and released after serving six months in prison.
The Korea Sexual Crimes False Counseling Center Facebook Capture
posted a report on the incident of B, who was arrested after being falsely reported by a 10-year-old girl, a friend of her daughter, on the 13th.
B went to her daughter’s friend’s house with her daughter and played games together in the living room. Mr.B played with Miss A, but was asked to play more.
B, who saw her crying daughter while playing alone, rejected A’s request to continue playing.
Then A pressed B, saying, “If you don’t play with me, I’ll call 112 or I’ll tell my mom.” Mr. B, who didn’t care about
, said, “Please scold me for telling me,” and returned home.
The Facebook capture of the Korea Sexual Offence Counseling Center
However, A later called 112 out of spite and accused them of “sexual assault.”
A reportedly stated that B touched her genitalia while touching her legs on her clothes, and that she made physical contact by touching her clothes even though she refused. Mr. B was arrested and arrested for six months until he was found not guilty.
It was because arrest investigation is a principle in the case of forced molestation of minors who violate the Special Act on Punishment, etc. of Sexual Violence Crimes.
The Korea Center for Sexual Offence Counseling said, “A women’s group submitted a statement that was credible despite the reversal of A’s statement and inconsistency.”
However, B was able to be acquitted and released in the first trial thanks to a six-second video taken to inform her parents of A’s rude behavior during the trial.
The video showed A lying on the bed while tearing off B’s hair.The prosecution appealed, saying, “There is no possibility that a child only 10 years old made a false report,” but the second trial court rejected, saying, “The girl’s unreliable statement seems to have made a false report to 112 as a means to pressure the man.”
The court also said, “In particular, excluding the results of the statement analysis of the Hae 000 Center affidavit that a 10-year-old girl can lie, it is unreliable to determine in advance that she is a victim of sexual violence and draw the statement.”Looking into the situation through the ruling released by
, A, the father of a friend, went to pick him up because his daughter was playing at her daughter’s friend B’s house.
B asked A to “play more” and said, “If you don’t play, I’ll report you to 112.
A felt that Ms. B was really likely to report sexual harassment and filmed a six-second video to inform her parents of her rude behavior. The
video showed B pulling A’s hair as a joke on B’s bed in B’s room.
A was acquitted in the first trial and released six months after his arrest, and the prosecution appealed that there is no possibility that a 10-year-old child may have falsely reported it as a lie!This is #54776.But the second trial court said the girl’s unreliable statement was true.Rather, the prosecution dismissed the prosecution’s appeal, saying it appears to have falsely reported to 112 as a means to pressure the man and processed and materialized his false behavior.In particular, the court ruled that the statement analysis of the 0000 Center affidavit excluded that B could lie, but rather judged in advance that B was a victim of sexual violence and that the process of drawing the statement was unreliable.
also said, “When I saw B jokingly pulling A’s hair in the video, I can at least assume that there was no sexual harassment before the video shoot.”And that 0000 center is the one we know, right?