Rep. Noh Jong-myeon: Is this an intention to divide the first-time re-elected and middle-ranking officials?

tBangja Komiya Jiri Mang C Move Minida
Noh Jong-myeon
1 minute
As I tried to fit it into the frame of an article, the facts became distorted:
12.31 The argument for impeachment of Choi Sang-mok is made in the Loyalty and Loyalty Party?
Cho Jae-seon rose up and the furious response was “impeachment”?
Since the premise is flawed, it is also a novel that the middle class is dead.
Is this an intention to divide the early Jae-seon and senior leaders?
Is it a compulsion to risk something and fall?
Criticizing Acting Director Choi Sang-mok’s appointment of 2/3 of current officials as illegal,
Evaluating the pros and cons of the 8-member system, which has become a reality even though it is illegal,
At this point, it is difficult to decide whether to condemn the school or not.
Everyone has different ears.
12.37 Uichung is consistent throughout
“The 213 appointment is illegal and grounds for impeachment, but
When considering disaster management and economic repercussions, etc.
“It is difficult to take action right away.”
Jungjin said, “I am also grateful for the appointment of two Hyeonjae-gwan members”?
An 8-person system is better than a 6-person system.
There is nothing to the effect that it can get better, but
The article never meant anything like that.
No one who spoke at the meeting
23 The appointment was not evaluated as normal.
No one is even calling for immediate impeachment.

In the teleroom after Uijong was over
Some are of the opinion that there is no need to close the possibility of impeachment.
Even though it does not conflict with the position of the organizer in Uijong,
This exchange of opinions takes place
Lawmakers are taking a serious look at the situation
It is a process of carefully checking the scope of words and actions.
Are you trying to make a knight?
There will be a need for hardliners who don’t care about the paralysis of government affairs.
Reporters have their own choices.
I wrote by hand on the afternoon of January 7th
How dare you join in the hardliner voice that came from King Uijong a day ago.
This is also an article that has nothing to do with the core ‘argument of impeachment’.
The ability to extract one line from a long article is also pathetic.
If they say they are appointed as an 8-member system, is that a transfer or is it normal?
Will the Hankook Ilbo be reorganized into an 8-member system?
I guess my writing isn’t that difficult.
Don’t you think it would be too much to try to fit into a frame?
The gist of my writing is as written.
‘Focus on forming a full 9-member Constitutional Court.
The Special Prosecution Act will be re-promoted using a third-party recommendation method.
If even this is ultimately rejected, then there is no other way than impeachment.’
(I will say in advance that this is an argument for ‘impeachment’.
This means not now)
The ‘100 won and 50 won remark’ from King Uijong (Rep. Park Seon-won)
It was distorted.
Even though there are no very easy and clear words to say that you should not be at ease,
I assumed he meant impeachment.
(This is an example used as a key argument, but it is said that it was done,
Cowardly and irresponsible writing, no)

Do not disturb the wires.
It is said that the civil war must be suppressed.
If it is a radical statement that does not even care about paralyzing government affairs,
Tackle it.
Don’t do anything about impeachment that hasn’t happened.
I see you doing this
Are you telling us not to impeach Choi Sang-mok no matter what he does?
I worry about the economy and government affairs just as much as you do.
Decisions on political affairs must also be made with caution.
Please, I have to risk something and overcome it.
I want to free myself from obsession.
D
Hankook Ilbo
subscribe
9 Q
Democratic Party’s “Impeachment of Choi Sang-mok” intensifies…
They are just there
Kim Jeong-hyeon
2025. 1 1 19.00