Filter by Category




These days, the 2nd party is talking about the Espionage Act.

0
(0)

image text translation

Kim Yong-hyeon (Dictionary model civil war model civil war status)
12.3 Proclamation of the ruling order of Un Seok-yeol
“(Gye-im-eun) Gyu-guk u Seul-deop”
treason criminals
Lee Sang-min (Participation in preliminary mock and internal affairs mock at the Cabinet meeting)
“Let’s see the national song properly – part ‘Stepmother 8th Festival'” “It’s an old report”
Mock participation
status
Deoksu Gwan
Seongjae Park
Youngro Kim
Processing business
meeting
meteorite fever
important mission
Lee Sang-hi Station
Cho Kuk, the party
Representative Park Eun-jung’s office
Simmok Choi
jogyuj
Imju Oh
5 years C
Shot to death /
Military opposition –
guv
,Bangwansugoe |
‘Executed by firing squad
death penalty review
‘Mugi 3 High School’
“Indefinite justice
‘Life imprisonment
capital punishment

In fact, revisions have been requested dozens of times before.

Article 98, Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Act stipulates that an act of espionage for an enemy country or an act of espionage for an enemy country is prohibited.

Those who assist are subject to the death penalty, life imprisonment, or more than 7 years in prison.

In Paragraph 2, the same punishment shall be imposed on anyone who leaks confidential information to an enemy country.

This is the main content.

The only enemy country mentioned here is North Korea. So, if you don’t do it to North Korea,

This means that there will be no major punishment.

As an actual example, ‘we Japan’ are currently conducting Japanese fleet review ceremonies, new lights, etc.

Kim Tae-hyo, first deputy director of the National Security Office, is controversial for various reasons.

He handed over military secrets to Japan, but was only fined 3 million won.

I understand that this was also pardoned by Yoon Seok-ryeol.

https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/society_general/1064483.html

So, due to various events, the Democratic Party moved from an enemy country to a foreign country.

I tried to change it, but the Han Myeong-sook incident (

https://m.inven.co.kr/board/webzine/2097/2368133?stype=subject&svalue=%ED%95%9C%EB%AA%85%EC%88%99

Someone from Oi Gallery posted a good summary a while ago, so I’m linking it.)

Yoo Woo-seong’s espionage manipulation case

(

https://m.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20230921175400004

) etc.

In hindsight, the prosecution used as many tricks and threats as possible.

It becomes a situation where the static can be easily removed unconditionally.

For example, in a situation where the prosecution met with a foreign figure as it always did,

A person who was with him was recruited, appeased, and threatened to give only one false testimony.

If you do so, it will not be a general punishment, but it will be tied to the Espionage Act and your political opponents will be sentenced to at least 7 years.

A situation arises where it could blow up. (Incitement of far-right forces is a bonus)

So, Rep. Park Joo-min became the leader, and any foreign and any data

to the situation

There was ongoing discussion about whether to include it.

The Espionage Act, which had not been negotiated for decades,

It is only now that the reason why the National Party suddenly pushed for the Espionage Act is revealed.

To punish all the anti-national forces that you are talking about by labeling them as spies.

If you think about it, it fits perfectly.

I am sure that this is the reason why the 2nd party is criticizing the Espionage Act these days.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Leave a Comment