image text translation
First of all, since we cannot know the specific contents of the contract, we can use normal contractual relationships and standards.
Based on the contract
The conclusion is that it would be very difficult for both lawyers to be grounds for terminating the contract.
Heo Joo-yeon
Normally, companies and (especially youth) artists must guarantee
There is a contractual obligation, but looking at Newgenes’ requirements, most of them are
It is not a direct problem between Adore and New Genes.
The only thing directly related to Adore is the consent of those who suffered damage caused by the album pushout.
Guarantee of New Genes’ unique work (Shin Woo-seok), photos and videos used without
Related) These are the three points: The rest are issues with other people, but this is a matter of contract.
It is not easy to enter the family because you have to go through one more step to claim a refund.
First of all, the problem with pushing albums is that Hive has had a system for pushing albums for a long time.
They consistently claim that there is no enemy. First of all, proof of the existence of push
What specific damage did New Genes suffer as a result of this year?
In addition, the contract that Adore violated during this process
I have to go through the process of finding out if I have any duties, but it doesn’t seem easy.
If there are videos or photos used without Dambreder’s consent, this is a problem.
However, I wonder if that is a level of violation that can lead to termination of the contract.
Must see.
Yang Ji-yeol
The most important point is to ask for Min Hee-jin to be returned, but this is what New Jeans claims.
It’s not something you can do.
And most of the problems raised are directed at Hivetle, except for Adore.
Since it is a separate legal personality, it seems difficult to raise legal issues.
Source: Kim Tae-hyun’s political show