Did the lawyer who criticized Dong-deok lose?

3333?
civilization
You should protest then.
Nova Law Firm
‘NOV LAw
241127 Dongduk Women’s University Live
For eyesight
That’s why I’m not protesting now.
List of discussants (with topics or stories that have been clarified by reflecting the opinions of viewers, etc.)
Eric Bak
(Selected first)
There was a commotion so I went underground.
Nari: Ordinary female college student = Society’s perspective on Dongduk Women’s University events is wrong.
Darmi
The protest itself: “It is an individual’s decision” “Women’s Party” /
Why excessive / Why social interest /
Yool
Additionally, why am I covering this? I am cautious about the pro-democracy protests.
Is this correct???
As far as answering attitude goes,
doctor’s fee
Quickly enter command to use
No, the incident itself is the same incident, but a different incident.
The broadcast mode has been successfully completed and the words used are displayed exclusively.
Viability:
garter
Go o_
city
1.30.16/3.5716
Wow

Characteristics of today’s discussion partner (-characteristics of Pyeongmi)
1. Do not express your thoughts logically, but rather as if you were expressing your emotions.
2 You just talk without listening to what the other person says. I stopped talking
3. In theory, the lawyer insists that he said something he didn’t say.
When it becomes unfavorable, they avoid the issue and continue to focus on irrelevant cases (even people don’t know about them):
5. I can’t even understand basic concepts.
I’ve been self-controversial for months and don’t even recognize it myself.
7. Go beyond the point and keep attacking the messenger person.
I am planning to teach law to a lawyer.
Debating is also about dealing with people, so the treatment is terrible.
In one word
Weakest as an opponent
discussion