image text translation
Yonhap News
Subscribing
Lee Soo
politics
economy
society
life
world
IT
Yonhap News
PicK(i
Ministry of Labor
‘New Jeans Hani, worker.
“I”…Workplace bullying complaint closed
Entered 2024.11.20. 8.35am
Modified 2024.11.20. 9.55am
Original text of article
Reporter Kim Eun-kyung
786
817
c) Gaga [s]
Western branch responds to fan complaints, saying, “We are equal parties to the contract.”
“Relationship of performance of contractual obligations in the position”
According to the Ministry of Employment and Labor on the 20th, Seoul Regional Employment and Labor Officeimage text translation
In the western branch, New Jeans fans are proud of the New Jeans damber ‘Damhani’.
In response to a complaint filed with the Ministry of Employment and Labor claiming that he was harassed in the workplace,
“It was administratively terminated as it was difficult to be considered an employee under the Labor Standards Act.”
He revealed, “I did it.”
Previously, New Jeans Hani had a live broadcast on YouTube last September.
While waiting in the Hive Pastoral Corridor, other people pass by.
I said hello to the celebrity and the manager, but the manager ignored me.
To claim to say ‘do it’.
One New Genes episode that watched the video said, “New Genes are being bullied in the hive.”
“The team suspicions must be proven to be substantive,” he told the Kookmin Newspaper.
There are no complaints filed with the Ministry of Labor through pain.
The Western District Office, which investigated for two days, responded to the complaint by saying, “Phanani
Use is dependent on the content and nature of the concluded management contract.
Labor standards that provide a working framework for the purpose of obtaining wages in a relationship
“It is difficult to consider them as workers under the law.”
The reason is that “each party is in the position of equal contracting parties.”
arbitrary
It is only a relationship in which contractual obligations are fulfilled, so it is necessary to avoid
Well, it’s hard to say that there is no director. “Sit down all the time.”
In addition, “Company employment rules applied to general employees, etc.image text translation
“My norms, institutions or systems do not apply”, “There are certain
Commuting to and from work without fixed working hours or location
“I can’t decide on my own time”, “I don’t have enough money for entertainment activities.”
Yongdeungol company and Palhani jointly bear the burden, etc.
presented as a person
In addition, “the amount paid is in the nature of a return letter and is not related to the work itself.”
“It is difficult to see it as an objective nature”, “Each person has to bear the burden of taxes”
And the point is that earned income tax is paid as business income tax.
‘”There are risks such as creating profits and incurring losses through entertainment activities.
It is also pointed out that “you can see that you are embracing it yourself.”
The Western Branch is the last case, and the Supreme Court ruled in September 2019
The nature of an immediate contract is similar to that of a work contract or delegation under the Civil Act.
Labor by referring to the ruling that it was an anonymous contract.
It is difficult to consider it as an employee under the Standard Act.
bright
Meanwhile, celebrities are prohibited from bullying and other harassment in the workplace.
Underground employment is subject to the Labor Standards Act, which clearly states the provisions of the Labor Standards Act.
self
There is no prevailing view that it is not.
Article 76, Paragraph 2 of the Labor Standards Act stipulates ‘status or relationship at work.
Using the dominant knee of the back, other people go beyond the appropriate scope for work.
Cause physical or mental pain to workers or disrupt the working environment.
It was reported as harassment in the workplace and was banned for two days.
It’s underground
To receive the two-day benefit, you must be an employee under the Labor Standards Act.
In addition to the court decision, the government also designated celebrities as labor assistants in 2010.
‘Exception target’ who has an exclusive contract with an entertainment agency and is active
There is a judgment that has been made.
https://n.news.naver.com/article/001/0015056551?sid=102
.
I was sighing because the Labor Relations Commission called this issue and wasted time, but other really important labor issues were buried and the question time was shortened. This was also pointed out on Straight.
Anyway, the Ministry of Labor made this decision.
It is still difficult to recognize jobs with a strong freelance nature, such as celebrities.
It’s an issue with another team’s manager, and clear evidence is needed because both sides are fighting for the truth, so even if it’s separate.