The reason why the Dongduk Women’s University student council president lost his senses (Kim Hyun-jung’s News Show)

1.

Isn’t this a way of expressing one’s opinion in a too drastic and unsavory way?

-> Because I’m anxious

2. Do you agree to destroy Chonghak? -> It wasn’t intentional, but students who got emotional happened to do it (?????)

3. The school claims that it has never pursued engineering -> The school’s claim: I think it exists based on the circumstances (?? No evidence)

4. Is there any external intervention? -> None. I believe they only came to show solidarity with other women’s universities. (In addition to other women’s universities, two people from the Women’s Party have already been seen + they are showing solidarity without knowing who they are)

5. Was this an action taken after democratically gathering the opinions of all students? -> I think the school’s response was undemocratic, so we ended up doing it in an undemocratic way too (lol). In the future, we plan to go through a process of collecting opinions from all students. (So until now…?)

6. Is engineering impossible because misogyny and crimes against women are rampant in society? ->

What’s going on with your company?? And isn’t the purpose of establishing a women’s college in the first place to break away from men and “protect” women?

7. What are you going to do with the 2.4-5.4 billion in damages? -> I don’t think it was calculated objectively. It just seems like the school is threatening me (um… lol)

8. There’s a connection to radical violence, right? -> None. (The legend is that all protest slogans and reasons for protest are anti-men)

9. The school secretly enrolled male foreign students! -> Covered the content

The minutes of the 24-01st meeting of the University Council of Dongduk Women’s University (January 17) contain the signatures of Student Council President Choi Hyun-ah and Vice President Kim Min-ji, who came for the interview.

10. The school side said, “The school refused to talk. On the day the meeting was scheduled, two out of three students no-showed.” -> (The school’s claim was that they would talk after unifying opinions through a school affairs meeting.) The school side said There is no physical evidence from either the school or the school, so I will pass on this.

11. Isn’t the method of protest so extreme that it is difficult to receive support from others? -> Student side: “Thank you for your opinion.”

Since this is an interview where the name is mentioned, no harsh comments are allowed.