[wd_asp elements='search' id=11]

Kwak Tube’s apology and part of its comments and ruling

()

Kwak Tube's apology and part of its comments and ruling

If that comment is true, bullying has been proven in a ruling…

Was this really what it said in the ruling…?   araboza

Kwak Tube's apology and part of its comments and rulingKwak Tube's apology and part of its comments and rulingThat’s right ㅇㅇ

The screenshot was taken after Lee Na-eun sued Lee Hyun-joo’s younger brother for defamation.

It is presumed that this is a non-transfer decision made in the process of receiving non-transfer -> objection -> final non-transfer.

Additionally, we are attaching the ruling posted by April member Kim Chae-won.

Kim Chae-won filed a complaint against rumors of ‘Lee Hyun-joo’s group bullying’, ‘estrangement between members’, and ‘dating with manager’, but it is believed that the case was not forwarded.

Kwak Tube's apology and part of its comments and ruling(+It was cut out in the screenshot, but the contents of the latter part of the judgment in the article)

However, the ruling confirms that the ‘love affair with the manager’ itself is false.

It was stated that the evidence was insufficient to establish defamation because the suspect’s false perception of this could not be assumed.

-> So it seems like it was not sent?

https://ent.sbs.co.kr/news/article.do?article_id=E10010253788

Everyone makes their own judgment

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Leave a Comment