Filter by Category




Contents related to Aylet plagiarism in the Min Hee-jin vs. Hive ruling

0
(0)

C = Adore, E = New Jeans, I = Eyelet, Creditor = Min Hee-jin

1. The similarity between Eyelet and New Jeans is something that even the public has been saying.

2. Adore has a legal obligation to take action against things that may interfere with or infringe on New Genes’ activities.

3. When Min Hee-jin created material pointing out the similarity between Eyelet New Jeans, she fulfilled her legal obligation in step 2.

4. New Jeans Moms contacted Min Hee-jin and asked her to take action regarding plagiarism from Eyelet New Jeans.

5. It is difficult to believe that Min Hee-jin encouraged New Jeans Moms.

6. Sending an email complaining about plagiarism to Hive actually fulfilled the notification obligation under the contract between shareholders.

Conclusion: Min Hee-jin’s pointing out the plagiarism issue of Eyelet New Jeans was not a breach of trust.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Leave a Comment