You can’t use it as evidence if it’s a serious invasion of privacy on a call recorded secretly by the Supreme Court

(1)D Yonhap News
(2)a secret recording of the call’s private life
(3)You can’t use it as evidence if it’s serious
(4)Hwang Yoongi input 2024 180600
(5)The first judgment of the Capital Law, which cannot be recognized for its admissibility of evidence, depending on the circumstances and contents of the recording
(6)Supreme Court Yonhap News Photo
(7)Seoul = Yonhap News Reporter Hwang Yoon-ki’s first judgment was made by the Supreme Court that if the contents of the call were recorded without the consent of the other party, the admissibility of evidence may not be recognized if the privacy was seriously violated in light of the circumstances and contents
(8)According to the legal profession on the 8th, the Supreme Court’s 3rd division, Lee Heung-gu, is the Supreme Court