Filter by Category




Fractured face after being hit by a golf ball…The caddie appeals court who shouted “Look at the ball” is also innocent

()

image text translation

(1)Fractured face after being hit by a golf ball…Show it to me
(2)The caddie appeals court is not guilty
(3)Herald Economy 202312102241AlChat To Summarize
(4)The photo of the caddie’s data has nothing to do with the content of the article. Herald Economy = Reporter Kim Yu-jin. A match assistant Caddy, who was accused of injuring a user during a golf game by neglecting his duty to prevent accidents, was also acquitted in an appeal trial
(5)Daegu District Court 3-1 Criminal Appeals Judge Kim Kyung-hoon announced on the 10th that he was acquitted as the lower court did in an appeal trial against A in his 40s charged with professional negligence
(6)A, who worked as a caddie at a golf course in Yeongcheon, Gyeongsangbuk-do, was assigned as a caddie for a golf game hosted by four people, including B, on August 25, 2021. At the 11th hole, when it was raining at the time, a ball hit by C, B’s party, was missed, flying to the face of B, who was 25 to 40 meters away from the front right, causing a fracture of three weeks before the surgery
(7)Accordingly, A was put on trial on charges of neglecting the accident, although he had to fulfill his duty to prevent accidents, such as allowing B and others to step back or restraining Gongchi C
(8)However, at the time of the accident, the first trial court acquitted A on the grounds that A warned B and others before C hit the ball, saying, “Look at the ball,” and that the victim’s golf experience and level were quite high, and that A warned the participants of the game not to go forward even before the accident
(9)In response, the prosecution appealed on the grounds of a misconception, but the appellate court also acquitted the court of the lower court
(10)The appeals court said, “As it is fully recognized that Mr. A gave caution before the accident, the original trial judged that he was innocent because it was insufficient to recognize it as a violation of the duty of care is justified, and there is no violation of the misconception of facts such as the prosecutor’s claim.”
(11)Bepple pyg2 12110214
(12)Prosecutor, stop it. It’s funny to charge this as caddie’s fault
(13)Isn’t it long? N
(14)Top comment recommendation 25 against 0
(15)Bepple aodk 121101068
(16)Is that a prosecutor? Shameless prosecutor N
(17)Recommendation 20. No. 0 comment. 0 comment
(18)Bepple cmga 121100408
(19)The prosecutor says he’s not playing golf, he’s playing golf
(20)How much do they ignore caddies! The test is probably
(21)I’m sure he did the sabasaba with the guy who got hit by a golf ball! N
(22)Recommendation 15. Opposite

!

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Leave a Comment