an accidental drug investigation

(1)Why are the suspicious cases of prosecutor’s brother-in-law’s belated investigation
(2)Was it repeated
(3)Enter 20231125 AM 431 The driver is
(4)Reporter Choi Dong-soon. Reporter Kang Jisoo
(5)There was no evidence of e-cigarettes submitted 100 days after the late investigation report, so the investigator was replaced at least three times, and the police investigation was delayed, explaining the reasonable reason for the delay in the police investigation
(6)Lee Jung-seop, the second chief prosecutor of the Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office, was transferred on the 20th as a representative of the Daejeon High Prosecutors’ Office
(7)Suspicionⓘ Drug Inspection 100 days after report
(8)Kang’s wife claims that Cho’s brother-in-law inhaled marijuana on February 5, but the police received Cho’s urine and hair voluntarily on May 19, three months and 15 days later
(9)Suspicion ② The suspicious situation at the time of the 112 report
(10)The evening of February 6, when the 112 call took place, was also an opportunity to investigate the incident At the time, Kang suspected her husband had taken drugs inside the house and saw her husband inhale drugs such as drugs in the past112 He beat me up after recording or taking drugsThe second report was made to the police However, when Cho refused to submit it voluntarily, the police withdrew without attempting a forced investigation
(11)Suspicion 3 The police didn’t answer the liquid horse device submitted by his wife
(12)After the report, Kang submitted several direct and indirect evidence to the police, handing over the smoke-based e-cigarette machine that Cho used to smoke liquid hemp However, the police did not send a smoke jet to the National Forensic Service, saying that the owner Cho had submitted evidence that he did not agree with As Kang secretly acquired and submitted the item, it is evidence of illegal collection contrary to the owner’s intention and lacks criminal circumstances to apply for a seizure warrant
(13)Suspicion ④ Police who did not apply for a warrant
(14)However, the police did not apply for a search warrant for Cho even after seeing his wife Kang’s statement and various circumstantial evidence It was concluded that it was not a criminal clue to launch a forced investigation
(15)Suspicion ⑤ investigator replaced six times
(16)In addition, Kang also took issue with the fact that the investigator was replaced six times in the simple marijuana inhalation case
(17)However, even if all such explanations from the police are accepted, it is still controversial that variables such as ① delayed drug testing ② passive 112 on-site response ③ disapproval of evidence of drugs 르ᅀᅀ passive investigation ⑤ who did not apply for a warrant could appear continuously only in this case