(1)The employee made the boss angryimage text translation
(2)Don’t come to the company from tomorrow!
(3)After hearing that, I didn’t come to the company
(4)a year and a half later
(5)He said he cut it, but he sued him for a month’s pay, and the court decided
(6)I was told not to come and kept the order It’s good to hear that the company was ordered to pay a year and a half’s salary, saying that he is still an employee
(7)Additional explanation What is mentioned above is an actual incident In 2019, workers A and B working at a theme park in Ise, Mie Prefecture, Japan, were advised to retire after a meeting with the human resources manager due to wage problems. However, the two did not intend to retire and expressed their intention to the company. The company fired the two, telling them not to have to go to work from tomorrow, but won the case due to unfair dismissalThe court ruled that saying, “You don’t have to go to work from tomorrow,” is one of the ways to dismiss employees who are allowed only when they agree to leave their jobs, and that if they had no intention of quitting as in this case, it was only one of the company’s instructions, not retirement, so the company should pay wages for employees who didn’t go to work afterwards.” 6 Movements
(8)Recommendation R reply
(9)Rally X 2023-11-05 105610
(10)If you’re going to fire him, don’t come out as in the text, but do the paperwork as FM based on legitimate reasons for dismissal
!