Judge Yoo Chang-hoon is accused of abuse of authority

(1)Economic Review
(2)Judge Yoo Chang-hoon dismissed warrant Lee Jae-myung alone
(3)be accused of abuse of authority
(4)※ Reporter Lim Hyuk ② Input 202310031602○ Modified 202310031643
(5)Oh Sang-jong, CEO of the Free Korean Patriotic Organization, filed a complaint with the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office on the 4th
(6)a submission press conference
(7)The legal representative is Do Tae-woo, who defended former President Park Geun Hye

(1)Judge Yoo Chang-hoon, who dismissed Lee Jae-myung’s arrest warrant, is scheduled to submit a complaint for abuse of authority
(2)After a press conference in front of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office at 10 a.m. on 2023 – Do Tae-woo, attorney for representative accuser Oh Sang-jong
(3)I would appreciate it if many organizations and individuals could voluntarily submit a complaint to the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office using the contents of the complaint below!
(4)part of a complaint
(5)”How much more conclusively can a criminal charge be proved, how much more blatant acts, such as the intervention of repeated statements against perjury teachers and key witnesses, and how many more witnesses need to die and be arrested and prosecuted?” The Korean legal community has never given the accused the authority to make arbitrary decisions, such as dismissing the arrest warrant in this case
(6)”The Supreme Court has established a rule on the handling of personal detention, and Article 48 (4) of this rule sets the standard for issuing arrest warrants on how much pressure or influence the suspect can exert on witnesses such as victims.” Judge Yoo Chang-hoon acknowledged circumstantial evidence that Lee Jae-myung, as the leader of a large opposition party, intervened in the testimony of his confidant but rejected the arrest warrant just because he is the leader of the opposition, a clear violation of the Supreme Court rules, a form of statute