the controversy over the impeachment of a poor farmer

(1)Boo Seung Chan, 11 hours. ⓒ
(2)Han Dong-hoon should be impeached
(3)Democracy is guaranteed its value when vertical accountability to the people and horizontal accountability based on the separation of powers of checks and balances between legislative and judicial administration are guaranteed
(4)If only one of the two axes collapses, the value of democracy will inevitably be underminedBut the Yoon Suk Yeoln regime is destroying all of this at the center of it
(5)Han Dong-hoon is here. It’s hard to list each and everything
(6)He violated the authority of the judiciary by neutralizing the Constitutional Court’s decision and ignoring the decision to dismiss the arrest of Democratic Party Chairman Lee Jae-myung
(7)In addition, the enforcement decree neutralized the higher law and paralyzed the legislative function by announcing the allegations against Lee Jae-myung through sophistry in the plenary session There are also too many reasons for impeachment
(8)This is not just Han Dong-hoon’s fault. The National Assembly, especially the opposition party, is also responsible for turning a blind eye to Han Dong-hoon’s abuse of authority. The National Assembly’s defiance of the Constitution’s order to check the Yoon Seok-yeol regime’s runaway is a felony that constitutes dereliction of duty
(9)Please take care of my rice bowl. The beginning of taking care of my rice bowl comes from Han Dong-hoon’s impeachment
(10)Is that the reason for impeaching the minister for investigating party leader Han Dong-hoon

(1)17 hours of Chu Mi-ae
(2)The National Assembly should hold Han Dong-hoon accountable
(3)Even though he was able to request a warrant during the first non-session, he deliberately requested a warrant during the session and read out the distortion and crime full of exaggeration without direct evidence to arrest him. He threatened national security through prior media distribution, and committed judicial blackmail by saying that he should be sentenced to less than 36 years and six months in prison or life imprisonment
(4)On the 2nd, when the minister of the Ministry of Justice rejected the warrant he had boasted, he said, “It is not innocent.”
(5)To say “guilty” when you haven’t held a hearing or tried is an anti-constitutional, anti-lawful statement and unqualified as justice minister
(6)3 When asked by a reporter if it was an unreasonable investigation, he said, “The investigation reveals the truth.” Even though the truth has not been revealed even after hundreds of raids, he is showing off his dangerous behavior to repeat the same method in the future
(7)4 The National Assembly should naturally hold the public accountable for violating human rights by abusing its investigative power and making them perform predictions of guilt by trampling on the reputation and defaming the leader of the official opposition party
(8)We need to bring forward an impeachment motion against a justice minister who ignores the law and abuses his power