[wd_asp elements='search' id=11]

Royal view apartment no problem.jpg

()

Royal view apartment no problem.jpg

image text translation

(1)There’s no problem with the Wangneung View apartmentDaekwang E&C and others won the second trial
(2)Input 20230907 PM 300 Correction 20230907 PM 359 Article Original
(3)Reporter HAN JAE HYUK, TALK
(4)The first trial’s ruling was rejected by the Cultural Heritage Administration
(5)Conflict over order to stop construction of Jangneung in Gimpo
(6)Residential Support Center
(7)Incheon = Newsis Reporter Bae Hoon-sik = In the morning of the 31st, when the move-in of the so-called Wangneung View apartment began, a notice of the move-in support center is posted at Daegwang-ro Jebiang Apartment in Geomdan, Seo-gu, Incheon Built without permission from the Cultural Heritage Administration, the apartment caused controversy by blocking the view of the UNESCO World Heritage Site in Gimpo, along with the construction of the Daebang of Duetre du Forre Hill in Yemiji Triple 20220531dahora83 newsiscom
(8)Seoul = Newsis Reporter Han Jae-hyuk = Construction companies related to apartments whose construction was suspended near Jangneung, Gimpo, won an appeal against the Cultural Heritage Administration to cancel the construction suspension
(9)On the 7th, the Seoul High Court Administration 9-1 Deputy Judges Kim Moo-shin, Kim Seung-joo, and Cho Chan-young ruled in favor of the plaintiff in a lawsuit filed by Daekwang ENC and Daegwang Gun-young against the head of the Gungneung Relics Division
(10)The court dismissed all of the defendant’s appeals and said the costs were borne by the defendant
(11)The Wangneung View apartment conflict erupted when the Cultural Heritage Administration raised the issue that apartments under construction by three construction companies near Jangneung in Gimpo were being built without permissionThe Cultural Heritage Administration claimed that buildings over 20m in historical and cultural environment preservation areas within a 500m radius of cultural assets should be reviewed in advance under the Cultural Heritage Protection Act, but construction companies did not follow the procedure

I expected it

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Leave a Comment