Breaking news law hate president jpg

(1)Court’s response to the president’s office’s lack of information on President Yoon’s meal expenses
(2)Input 20230904 PM 641 Article text
(3)Reporter Lee Jung-won, TALK
(4)Information Disclosure Litigation, please raise your hand, civic groups
(5)It’s not a major national interest or invasion of privacy
(6)There is no breakdown of the meal expenses At the presidential office’s request
(7)Violation of the right to know and violation of the rule of law

(1)There are three pieces of information that the court pointed out to cancel the president’s refusal to disclose. △ The details of the expenses spent by President Yoon and his spouse Kim Gun-hee when watching a movie broker at a theater in Seoul on June 12 last year △ The details of dinner expenses reportedly spent by President Yoon at a Korean restaurant in Gangnam, Seoul on May 13 last year △ The details of special activities spent since the government were already disclosed
(2)The court accepted the Taxpayer’s Federation’s claim that the disclosure of such information does not constitute information that is believed to significantly harm the nation’s grave interests Instead, it was judged that disclosure was rather “necessary for the public interest or relief of individual rights.”

(1)55th Cabinet Meeting
(2)With the people of Korea
(3)I will make a country where laws and principles stand right