[wd_asp elements='search' id=11]

LK-99 may not be a superconductor

()

You might be wondering what I’m talking about

Listen carefully to Kim Hyun-tak’s SBS interview and Seeds interview

Don’t just look at the subtitles

Kim Hyun-tak never says he’s a superconductor

I’m just saying that LK-99 is superconducting

I use the word superconductor only once, not LK-99, but only when I talk about an existing superconductor

You might wonder what I’m talking about, but theoretically, X is a superconductor, and X is a superconductor, which is a different argument

Iris has the same opinion and suggested the term superconducting phase support scaffold instead of superconductor

httpstwittercomiris_IGBstatus1687367290566656000

However, I and Iris are of the opinion that the definition of superconductors should be changed to include superconductive supporting plates, although this is not the case according to the current definition of academic terms

출저httpsmdcinsidecomboardthesingularity271137

LK-99 is not a superconductor, but a new substance that includes room temperature atmospheric pressure superconductor Depending on how much current doping of LK-99 is performed, it can be a nonconductor, a semiconductor, or a superconductor

In other words, superconductivity is a broader set of new materials that has a phenomenon that’s part of a subset that can be implemented

LK-99 may not be a superconductor
image text translation

(1)I can’t explain it unless it’s a superconductor
(2)Kim Hyun-tak, research professor at William & Mary University in the United States
(3)I wanted to hear the answer whether this is a superconducting or not
(4)A superconducting expert told me I was right

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Leave a Comment