I exchanged e-mails with Dr. Jung Hee-joon of the Korea Institute of Standards, who targeted science that was impossible

(1)Oh, 434 6 sentences
(2)To me ▼
(3)Sure, be my guest.
(4)First of all, I have nothing to do with Ik99 this time I think I need to clarify thatAs I said earlier, I’m Dr. Jung Hee-joon from the Korea Institute of Standards and Technology
(5)As for Lk99, the archive itself is not a credible paper itself, so it’s like a data center where people put up flags so that they don’t claim to be peer reviewed, not an official paper
(6)Now, to explain this again, nothing has yet been proven to be in the archive, and the paper itself may not even be the last data to be published It means that you can replace it with better data through peer review or through follow-up experiments over time, so I’m sure it doesn’t mean that the paper in the archive itself has been verified or is being verified
(7)Also, papers like science and nature have an embargo that shouldn’t be published in advance of any of the reviews, so no one knows how to put it and which data is actually peer review Also, science and nature take 3-4 people to review, unless it’s a really special case, 3-6 months It’s almost impossible to publish in about a month, but I’m not interested in anything like this
(8)It can be ironed out very quickly, so I’m sure it’s not a situation where you can’t just say it in a quantum lab or something like that’s currently under review

(1)Now, if you look at the real LK99 properties, even at high temperatures, the resistance is as low as metal, but the resistance drops more rapidly in an instant, and the superconductivity is correct Mit metal-insulator transition, which is called “Can’t Do Science,” has the opposite characteristics LK99 has a low resistance like metal, a low resistance like metal, a low resistance like metal, and then suddenly, at a high temperature, a low resistance like metal, and then a low resistance like an insulator, which means that it’s the exact opposite
(2)Even at high temperatures, LK99 was originally low in metallic resistance at about 400K and then rapidly lowered to a lower resistance even before room temperature, so the graph shows that the resistance is close to zero near room temperature 300K, so it definitely has superconductive properties
(3)Another science that can’t be done here is sweeping the current in such a wide range of temperatures, and it’s like you’re shooting it in tiny, very detailed units in every area, but the word itself is absurd Because the machine itself can only measure a certain area well, it is not possible to measure a very low current that suddenly has superconductivity at the same time after measuring a moderately high current value at high temperatures You have to go to the superconducting current area, set the exact measurements that can take a very small current, and then take it separatelySo you can’t take it on the same scale You can’t measure 100 million won for one and suddenly take a picture of 01 together So it’s natural to take two separate graphs, so near the superconducting area, the resistance is close to zero, so the noise level or the measurement value is only measured in the detection limit, so if the data is correct, it’s probably superconducting in itself
(4)However, it’s shown in the video that the antimagnetism is not completely visible, but from what I see, the central area is super-polar and the surface is not perfect, so it doesn’t float completely and one side can stick together, but the other side is more firey

(1)That’s my opinion, and my old professor in the U.S. said that he had a resistance that was 2,500 times smaller than graphite at room temperature, so no material can be so good right now
(2)There may be a problem with the definition of whether superconductivity is classified as superconductivity only when the resistance is absolutely zero, but at least it’s definitely close to superconductivity I don’t remember seeing the instantaneous resistance drop like that as metallic materials go down in temperature except for superconductivityThe mit, as an example from the science that shouldn’t be done, is that when the temperature is lowered, it goes from metal to insulator, which increases the resistance
(3)Even if the insulator-metal transition is similar, where the metallic reverse temperature drops in the insulator 100 times, it must be an insulator at first at high temperatures But from the start, it’s a metallic conductor in the whole area So it’s definitely different from before
(4)My personal opinion is that we haven’t perfected all of the crystalline samples yet, so we don’t think semi-magnetic is fully implemented
(5)Even though this is made by a company, they ask for samples for free here and there, and they want to verify it, but they have to pay about 100 million won for samplesOr do they create and implement themselves according to the recipe, even during the review of the paper, it doesn’t make sense to scatter the originality of the originality elsewhere, and then the paper falls right away It’s common sense. Even if you do a verification, if you don’t know the person who does the thesis, you don’t want to give it to me That’s also free for businesses
(6)If I were you, I would like to verify it with a research institute like Argonne Ibnllanl fel nistni mit Stanford Oxford Cambridge, not the Korean Superconductor Association without any credibility

(1)However, the difference from Hwang Woo-suk and other examples is that the published status is truly an archive and the thesis has not even been published Hwang Woo Seok was published in Science We don’t know what kind of reviews we’ve got, let alone a title yet, but we don’t know what kind of review we’ve got. It seems like a very different situation It was absolutely right, but it turned out to be wrong later, and this Ik99 is about to do something, but it’s all over the place In a way, if it doesn’t work, there’s no problem
(2)I think even if it’s superconducting, and it’s fully validated, it’s going to take about 10 years for real-world applications like mass production to grow the decisions in each field, make them fit each system, and try various deposition methods
(3)Thank you.
(4)Jung Hee Jun Dream