(1)I’m subscribed to Daily An
image text translation
(2)The reason why the Changwon spy group is demanding a public participation trial is because of the legal community
(3)When I asked, it was 145
(4)Input 20230511 AM 506 Modified 20230711 AM 918 Article Source
(5)Reporter Lee Taejoon, TALK
(6)One more
(7)Cho Joo-bin’s exclusion from the National Security Law will be rejected if a certain conclusion of Moon Chang-won’s spy agency and other case jurors is deemed to be out of line with the law and evidence principle
(8)An official of the Gyeongnam Progressive Union, who is accused of contacting North Korean officials in Southeast Asian countries, attends the Seoul Central District Court in Seocho-gu, Seoul, on the afternoon of the 31st of last month for a warrant review ⓒYonhap News Agency
(9)Dailyan = Reporter Lee Tae-joon The court decided to exclude the Changwon spy agency defendants who were put on trial for violating the National Security Act. Legal circles analyzed that the Changwon spy agency defendants are likely to have applied for a public participation trial to delay the trial In addition, it was interpreted that the court rejected the application for a public participation trial as the charges of violating the National Security Law applied to the defendants in this case were often related to state secrets
When I asked the legal community why the Changwon spy group demanded a public participation trial, I asked 145 navercom
image text translation
(1)Delayed trial of sole national security law offenders
(2)The prosecution’s plan to disable the prosecution was pushed forward as it became popular
(3)Input 20230802 AM 501
(4)a family of one street
(5)If the trial stops at the request for a public participation trial
(6)Consideration of exclusion from the restraining period
(7)It was reported on the 1st that the prosecution began to come up with countermeasures after the National Security Law criminals accused of the so-called “spy group case” used a strategy of delaying the trial, such as applying for a public participation trial The prosecution is reportedly considering a plan to revise the Criminal Procedure Act through government legislation
(8)Since the year before last, the prosecuted National Security Law criminals have been using various delaying strategies since the first trial, and the trial has not been held properly In the meantime, there have been cases where the six-month detention period has expired and they have to be released, but they are trying to prevent it
(1)Article 92 of the Criminal Procedure Act stipulates that the defendant’s arrest period by trial level
image text translation
(2)It shall be up to six months, but the period during which the trial process is suspended due to the Defendant’s illness is not included in the arrest period It is said that this is not the case where the National Security Law offenders delay the trial due to the request for bail for the public participation trial, the request for unconstitutional legal trial, and the request for the transfer of jurisdiction
(3)In response, the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office recently submitted a written opinion to the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office that the Criminal Procedure Act needs to be revised so that the trial process is not included in the arrest period The first part of the public investigation is in charge of investigating and trial of the case of self-unification of the people Currently, the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office’s planning and coordination government is currently reviewing this opinion
(4)In the case of the Chungbuk Community Association case, which was indicted in September 2021, the trial did not proceed properly because the defendants filed a series of requests for bail to request an unconstitutional legal trial They have been released on bail for the expiration of their detention period and are on trial without detention
(5)The self-inflicted defendants, who were indicted in March, have been dragging their feet by re-appealing their appeals when they applied for a public participation trial and were rejected It is said that the main trial has not yet been held, and the defendants of the “Representative Case of the Jeonbuk Jeonju Civic Group of the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions Spies” also applied for a public participation trial The defendants in these cases will expire in September or November
(6)The Supreme Prosecutors’ Office also believes that it is inappropriate for procedures made to guarantee the defendant’s right to defend to be abused for the purpose of delaying the trial However, as it affects the entire trial system, it is a position to carefully review related contents If the prosecution finally determines that the law needs to be revised, it can propose it to the Ministry of Justice to push for the revision of the law through government legislation
As the trial of the sole national security law was delayed… NAVERCOM to promote the prosecution’s incapacitate the Prosecution Service
Taking advantage of a loophole in the law to drag on
At first, he intentionally applied for a public participation trial and was dismissed
It takes a very long time to investigate the reproduction of original evidence, including videos and recorded files, and it is more complicated because it is the National Security Law
This time, the Defendants delayed the trial with various strategies such as applying for a postponement of the trial, an unconstitutional law trial, a request for bail, etc
The lawyer was replaced four times When the court refused to accept the request to evade the judge, it took two months after an appeal and re-appeal
The defendants have already been released on bail, etc. of expiration of their detention period
Since a long time ago, there have been many rumors that the National Security Law and sex crime are the exit of the defendant’s indulgence, but it is slowly becoming a problem