Filter by Category




Summary of EXO CBX vs. SM’s difference in position

0
(0)

Summary

1 CBX, please enter

Three EXO members have notified SM of the cancellation of their exclusive contract and are going to file a lawsuit

– The standard contract recommends 7 years, but the current contract that EXO has signed is

If only domestic activities include 7 years of overseas division, it is a contract condition for 7 years

In fact, it is a pun with a 7-year contract, and an abnormal long-term contract of 12 to 13 years has been maintained

– Pressure is applied to contract by pushing into the re-contract contract even though proper negotiations are not possible without these unfair long-term contracts being completed

– I have been receiving settlement only by trusting SM’s words, and now I have asked the company for settlement details because I am curious about the settlement, but SM does not accept it

2 SM suddenly gave Big Planet MADE

Another company tried contacting a celebrity without permission before the contract ended

3 Big Planet Maid Factless MC Mong, who is currently talking about, can also take legal action if he is not an in-house director

Enter SM

– Monthly settlement progress settlement data can be viewed at all times, and there was no problem with the artist related to settlement

– Even though it is settlement data that can be viewed at any time, it is being driven as a reason for termination by requesting the provision of a copy, and we are suspicious of tempering

-It is a contract under a standard exclusive contract and the contract period is also recognized by the Supreme Court due to a lawsuit by one EXO member, and in the case of a new exclusive contract, a contract completed after consulting with a large law firm lawyer on the member’s side

5 The tempering claimed by MC Mong SM is groundless and not in a position where tempering is possible, but I am personally close to the three members, so I only consoled them, but I will sue them if they talk more

6 EXO members will enter

-Tempering is a false fact to mislead the essence

-The settlement data of the exclusive contract, which needs to be carefully reviewed for 30 days, cannot be considered to have been fulfilled through inspection. SM has consistently requested the provision of settlement data, but SM finally refused to notify the cancellation of the exclusive contract

– The contract is unfair and the legal agent participating in the preparation of the contract is separate. Currently, the legal agent has changed. The clause that the contract period is automatically extended until the album is fully released without an extension limit is a clear slave contract

-SM has never paid a contract fee for renewing a contract. – It is also considering filing a lawsuit against the Fair Trade Commission

-Though the contract with SM is over, we are still working on EXO activities

Shorter Summary

Three EXO members, come on in

At this time, the contract was abnormally long enough to be considered unfair, and even though the contract was not completed and proper negotiation was not possible, it was pressed to sign a strange re-contract that allowed automatic extension without an extension limit

And please open the statement of settlement. It is our right to copy it so that we can see it closely

Enter SM

As it has already been certified by the Supreme Court, there is no room for the contract to be considered legally unfair, and you also wrote the re-contract with a lawyer

And why do you need a copy when you can view the settlement details

I didn’t contact you under the water to get you out of another company

MC Mong and Big Planet Maid, please come in

I didn’t try to bring EXO members. MC Mong met me personally and comforted me


How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Leave a Comment