httpsnnewsnavercomentertainarticle0210002573406
The 14th Civil Affairs Department of the Seoul Central District Court ruled in favor of some of Kim’s plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed by Kim against Shim Hyung-tak and his mother, Lee, in February last year, but dismissed all claims against Shim Hyung-tak
On February 25 last year, Kim filed a lawsuit against the two to pay 477 million won and delayed interest According to the ruling obtained by the Munhwa Ilbo, the court ruled that Shim Hyung-tak’s mother should pay 300 million won in principal and interest calculated at a certain rate, while the plaintiff will pay the costs of the lawsuit between the plaintiff and the defendant As Shim Hyung-tak was acquitted, the trial was conducted for more than a year and all the lawyer’s expenses were returned
Kim has claimed that in the process of lending money, he sent the loan to Shim Hyung-tak’s account and received a confirmation of payment performance that Shim Hyung-tak jointly guarantees the debt In response, Shim Hyung-tak said, “I didn’t know Kim nor did my mother borrow money from the plaintiff,” and complained, “It’s true that my mother managed Shim Hyung-tak’s account, but only my mother’s seal was stamped on the confirmation box.”
In response, the court accepted Shim Hyung-tak’s claim and confirmed that Shim Hyung-tak guarantees his mother’s debt, saying that Kim and Shim Hyung-tak never met in person or talked over the phone Considering that Kim did not raise any objections to the fact that his mother was a debtor and Shim Hyung-tak was a joint guarantor, he explained the reason for the sentence that the person who borrowed the loan from Kim was not Shim Hyung-tak
In addition, the court dismissed Kim’s claim for the return of unfair gains against Shim Hyung-tak, saying there was no reason
In response to the ruling, Shim Hyung-tak told the Munhwa Ilbo on the 23rd that it was a very difficult and long time “I couldn’t act normally because of the long trial and stress and psychological anxiety,” he said, adding, “I was able to resolve my unfairness through this ruling. I will repay those who supported me in my original place and live a more economically independent life.”