[wd_asp elements='search' id=11]

More than 10 houses should be banned under the Gap Investment Act

()

More than 10 houses should be banned under the Gap Investment Act

image text translation

(1)As of January 2, 23, the main suspect of the jeonse fraud
(2)Villa King Kim
(3)1,139 houses in the Seoul metropolitan area
(4)Architectural king A villa king Lee
(5)The God of Villa, Mr. Kwon
(6)413 houses including Incheon, 2709 Seoul, etc
(7)3493 nationwide
(8)Villa King Jeong-mo
(9)200 houses including Seoul
(10)400 houses including Gwangju

Even if you make money as a rental business, 10 houses is enough

You’re asking if it makes sense in a capitalist society to not let you buy a house when you have money

You can’t buy more than 10 houses. You buy dozens and hundreds of houses with gap investment, and the market price drops, so you’re going to auction them off Socialization of the cost of privatization of profits. Is it normal capital activity to shift the blame for investment failures to others

Social costs are overwhelmingly greater than the impediment to economic activity caused by a ban on gap investment

Why should individuals be allowed to buy more than 100 homes? We should regulate themAnd I bought it with other people’s money. I bought it with hundreds of lease deposits or loans, so there’s a lot of trouble. People die, hundreds of thousands are kicked out of the streets, and the government is rushing to come up with tax support Capitalism, not capitalism, or are we living in a laissez-faire era

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Leave a Comment