Former Minister Choo Mi-ae’s SNS

(1)It’s not enough to tease Yonggong, so it’s “one.”
(2)Ahn Jung-geun and Kim Dae Jung, who dedicated their lives to the nation’s soul
(3)Don’t drag it in. It’s ignorance and blasphemy
(4)1 What on earth did the Yoon administration gain from “Don’t ask, pro-Japanese play”
(5)be using one’s own money rather than one’s own
(6)After Japan’s export ban retaliation measures, it became independent competitive by bringing Japanese small businesses to Yongin
(7)The budget for supporting small businesses in Korea is significant
(8)I cut it
(9)It is our corporation and our people who suffer from monopolistic diplomacy
(10)I can’t do it with Yonggong after 2 seasons, so I’ll do it with “anti-Japanese.”
(11)It tries to cover up diplomatic failures and block public outrage and criticism
(12)The media did not criticize Ahn Jung-geun’s diplomacy
(13)Blasphemy of thought, glorifying Ogakura Denshin, and Yoon
(14)It adorns the president’s empty sense of history
(15)How did Ogakura’s aggressive Asianism lead to Ahn’s
(16)It’s like peaceful Asianism
(17)The “Oriental Peace Theory” is an anti-invasion and equivalent
(18)It’s to prosper together as a sovereign nation, Ogakura
(19)Denshin’s idea of the people of the country is to understand the logic of armed Japanese rule
(20)The justifying logic provided the basis for the “Great East Asian Commonwealth.”
(21)It is a defamation of Ahn and a denial of the history of anti-Japanese independence

(1)Japan has not apologized dozens of times
(2)a stopgap measure to avoid inconvenience
(3)It should have been an apology of penance based on truth, not an apology Even if there were a couple of apologies with Japan’s reflection, it should not be overturned, but it was then overturned because it was not at fault and in 2015, it demanded an irreversible agreement from us A handful of Japanese intellectual journalists who told the truth of the attack were also persecuted
(4)President Kim Dae Jung’s Korea-Japan agreement, which said, “Let’s go to the future,” decided to face the past and aim for the future, but distinguish between politics and history. Instead of turning a blind eye to the truth, it gave us the task of jointly studying historical truth He proudly demanded that the visit of war criminals was not an apologyHowever, since Obuchi’s cabinet, Japan’s commitment to facing the past has not been properly kept, and without doing homework, it has pushed ahead with visiting Yasukuni Shrine, where war criminals are
(5)5 If you judge the fate of a country based on your personal pro-Japanese preference
(6)The national interest is cut off
(7)When he was the Attorney General, he devoted his youth to Japanese Military Sexual Slavery
(8)Rep. Yoon Mi-hyang is being insulted by the law
(9)an investigation into an individual that gave but was largely acquitted
(10)It’s not only abuse of prosecution and human rights violations, but it’s also
(11)I’ll make you think that the comfort women are the breadwinners
(12)to build trust in the campaign to address Japanese Military Sexual Slavery
(13)Despite Japan’s interference, Rep. Yoon damaged it
(14)The issue of Japanese Military Sexual Slavery, which has been raised as an international human rights issue
(15)have damaged the weight As the prosecutor general, he has already abused the power of prosecution and caused serious harm to the national interest

(1)There is no expression of apology
(2)Therefore, avoiding a meeting with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi last year, the third-largest U.S. protocol, is considered to be related to Pelosi’s activities that pointed out the comfort women issue to Abe and passed the U.S. House resolution
(3)It was a valuable opportunity to solve the Japanese Military Sexual Slavery problem with international solidarity That’s why Speaker Pelosi
(4)The opportunity to correct discrimination against Korean companies has also been lost before the IRA bill, which holds a parliamentary salary, was passed
(5)6 You could have done it like President Kim Dae-jung, who distinguished politics from history If you want to go to Japan, you should not sell history Seriously, who
(6)Whether people and history are easily used as political wealth while making fun of the public’s resentment by “anti-Japanese bullying”