My daughter, who had been raised for 40 years, was turned over in the hospital.jpg

(1)Rep. Han Kwang-beom of the E-Daily Journalist, The child who gave birth was found in the hospital.
(2)The court ruled that the hospital should pay compensation for the family members who learned about the change after 42 years.
(3)According to the legal circles on the 18th, Judge Kim Jin-hee of the Seoul Western District Court ruled in a lawsuit filed by A couple and daughter C against D, who was the operator of an obstetrics and gynecology clinic, that “D should pay 50 million won each to A couple and C.”

(1)Female A and male B, who are married, are D in March 1980.
(2)She gave birth to a girl at an obstetrics and gynecology clinic in Suwon. At that time, the obstetrics and gynecology nurse delivered C to A and his wife at the hospital, saying they were newborns.
(3)It was in April last year when the daughter was over 40 years old that the couple, who raised her daughter C as their biological child, faced an ordeal, and found out that her daughter C’s blood type was a blood type that could not be found between the couple.

(1)Because of this, Mr. and Mrs. A had a conflict, and the angry Mr. A’s
(2)As a suggestion, the entire family underwent a genetic test in May last year. Surprisingly, the result was that the daughter C and A couple did not have a paternity relationship.
(3)Mr. A and his wife saw that the child had changed at the hospital where Mr. A gave birth, and checked with Mr. D, who was the hospital operator at the time, whether he had childbirth records at the time, but heard that all medical records were discarded. As all medical records were discarded at the time, it became virtually impossible for the couple to identify the biological biological parents who actually gave birth to C and the biological biological parents who actually gave birth to C.
(4)A couple and their daughter C filed a lawsuit for damages, saying, “The child suffered mental pain because the child was reversed at the hospital,” adding, “We should pay 50 million won each to the plaintiffs, but pay delayed interest of 5 per year as of March 1980.”
(5)The court also ruled in favor of Mr. A’s family. “It is difficult to assume that A gave birth to another child while he was growing up after being discharged from the hospital,” the court said. “Unless A is acknowledged to have given birth at D’s clinic and a paternity relationship is not recognized, D’s clinic can admit that C and A’s newborn gave birth.”

(1)He said, “Deliver C, not a biological child, to A and his wife.
(2)What he did was due to the negligence of Mr. D himself or the nurse he hired, he said. “Mr. D is obligated to compensate Mr. A and Mr. C for damages as an illegal offender himself or his employer.”
(3)The court set the amount of alimony at 50 million won each for A and C, saying, “It is virtually impossible to identify A’s biological biological parents and A’s couple had a disagreement for a while due to misunderstanding, and the accident was due to D’s total negligence.”
(4)However, the calculation date of the delayed damages was not March 1980, when the child was reversed, but May 2022, when genetic testing confirmed that he was not a parent.