The Reality of Dr. Cole on Airplane

(1)Dr. Cole, complete conquest Feat Samaritan law.
(2)I already have a conclusion before, but I’m using it because there are people who don’t know.
(3)I see royalty when I’m on the plane.
(4)1 Absolutely no meaning out
(5)Drink wine when you’re on the second train.
(6)There’s no other conclusion that penetrates the essence more than this.
(7)I don’t know the details, but be sure to understand the above two.
(8)I’ll organize the details by item.

(1)Dr. Cole, do you have to comply? If you don’t, you won’t be punished.
(2)If there is a serious patient such as MI on the plane, it will be handled according to the emergency medical law.
(3)Among them, Article 5, Clause 2 states that you must respond to Dr. Call.
(4)Article 5 Obligation to report and cooperate with emergency patients 누구 Anyone who finds an emergency patient shall immediately report it to an emergency medical institution, etc.
(5)② When an emergency medical worker requests cooperation necessary for emergency medical care, he/she shall actively cooperate.
(6)It’s a clause when there’s a patient outside of medical care, and there’s no punishment.
(7)I’m sure you all know that there’s a denial of care punishment in the medical institution.There’s a lot of emergency care, but it’s in paragraph 6.

(1)Article 6 Prohibition of Refusal of Emergency Medical Care, etc. 응급 Working at emergency medical institutions, etc.
(2)An emergency medical worker shall faithfully engage in emergency medical services so that he/she can always treat emergency patients.
(3)If an emergency medical worker is requested for emergency medical treatment or finds an emergency patient during work, he/she shall immediately provide emergency medical treatment and shall not refuse or avoid such request without justifiable grounds.
(4)Punishment is in Article 55.
(5)Article 55 Suspension of License and Qualification of Emergency Medical Workers, etc. (1) The Minister of Health and Welfare may revoke an emergency medical worker’s license or qualification or suspend his/her license or qualification for a period of not more than six months: 1 In the case of violating Article 6 (2) 8 (1) 18 (2) 39 Article 40 or 49 (1)
(6)When you refuse to comply with Article 6, Paragraph 2, if you refuse a patient while working at a medical institution, your license will be suspended or revoked.
(7)There is no penalty for Article 5.
(8)Conclusion Dr. Cole, if you don’t comply, it’s a violation of the law, and

(1)2 What happens if the patient is a vegetative person or died after having no choice but to respond to Dr. Call?
(2)The Samaritan law applies here. To be exact, it only applies to the pattern.
(3)Article 5-2 Immunity of Emergency Medical Care If there is no intention or serious negligence in property damage or casualties caused by providing emergency medical care or first aid to an emergency patient in critical condition, the actor shall not be liable for civil injury or criminal liability for death shall be reduced.
(4)(1) An emergency medical worker who has provided first aid by a person who does not fall under any of the following items:
(5)(b) A person in charge of first aid of a ship under Article 86 of the Seafarers Act who is obligated to provide first aid under other Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a first aid unit under Article 10 of the 119 Rescue and Emergency Services Act;
(6)2 Emergency medical care provided by emergency medical personnel within the scope of their licenses or qualifications when they are not performing their duties.
(7)3 First aid when a person obligated to provide first aid under subparagraph 1(b) is not performing his/her duties.

(1)There’s a lot of talk about the scope of coverage, but to begin with, it’s a medical person outside of a medical institution.
(2)The important thing here is that if there is no intentional or gross negligence, the actor shall not be liable for civil liability and criminal liability for injury or injury, and the criminal liability for death shall be reduced or exempted.
(3)That means there must be no gross negligence, but there is no responsibility.
(4)In other words, if you don’t do emergency medical treatment from the beginning, you’re not responsible at all.
(5)The lawyer in charge of the bereaved family of the Bongchim death said it himself.
(6)Then who will judge whether there is a serious fault?
(7)Under current law, there’s no court outside.
(8)That means you’re going to sue him.
(9)But isn’t it weird?
(10)Even if there is no law above, if a patient dies or becomes a vegetative person while a doctor treats him, he or she becomes a law.
(11)You know, when you go to the original, you’re going to see if there’s any

(1)In other words, in order to protect medical practitioners under the Samaritan Act, the above item must be changed to a case where there is no gross negligence -> an unintentional case to be properly protected.
(2)In addition, the item “Do not prosecute property damage and thoughts” should be added.
(3)It should also be added that the state bears all costs when a civil lawsuit is committed.
(4)In other words, the current Samaritan law has no protection for medical practitioners, but it is limited.
(5)The bottom line is that the Marian law doesn’t In a word, you’re a j.

(1)Those medical students who are still worried about Dr. Cole coming, wake up.
(2)If it goes well, if it goes wrong, it’s a disgrace. Why do you take Dr. Call?
(3)If it’s not your family, don’t come forward.