It’s a 1996 movie about the White House bombing of Independence Day.
Some of you might think it’s worth watching considering it’s the 90s computer graphic.
That’s a miniature version of the White House that actually blew up.
Even in the 80’s or 90’s, the classic special effects, stop motion photography miniature.
Matte painting techniques, which we also do with CG, but here’s a real way of drawing a background. Like
They still used the classical method, and in the ’80s, CG wasn’t used in movies.
It wasn’t used, but it wasn’t used.
It was used in movies like Tron in 1982, but it’s an exceptional case.
The real world is not embodied in CG, but in the game, CG is actually expressed in CG.
As we entered the ’90s, it gradually became the mainstream of special effects.
So when you watch movies in the 80s and 90s and say that CG is bad or that CG is good for movies in the 80s,
That’s not true. Some people said that the CG of the original Star Wars series was good for that time.
The Star Wars original series trilogy is made with stop motion shooting techniques and miniature mat painting techniques.
It’s a movie.
In the second half of the first Terminator film, the movement of the metal skeleton of the Terminator resurrected in the fire
It’s made with stop motion.
Simply put, in a 24-frame movie, 24 times a second, changing the movement of the model little by little, taking pictures one by one, in a row.
If you turn it around, it looks like it’s moving.
Now, it’s rarely used in live-action movies unless it’s a special case.
Many people mistakenly think that CG=special effects are not the same.
CG is a sub-concept of special effects.
Best Visual Effects when you give awards at the Academy Film Festival.
They don’t say it’s CG.
Developing CG is good for the audience,
These days, I wonder if it’s a CG for movies or a movie for CG.