President Lee Eon-joo’s intervention in the nomination is the reason for impeachment

(1)Lee Eon-joo 6 hours ago.
(2)I tried to stop paying attention to the convention, but I said something because I thought it would be a disaster if I just let this go.
(3)Kim Ki-hyun, a judge, or one person, makes such sophistry, but if the president intervenes in the nomination, it violates the Constitution and becomes a reason for impeachment. Is he trying to make a reason for the president’s impeachment?
(4)Korea’s Constitution, where the president is the head of the administration and lawmakers are the president of the legislature, is based on the separation of three powers, and the most important role of the legislature is to monitor and check the administration. The principle of operation is different from the cabinet system in which the prime minister’s cabinet is prearranged and they are elected to power in general elections. In a cabinet system, the prime minister’s power is much less than the presidential system, and at any time, the prime minister can be distrusted, the parliament dissolved, and the general election can be held again.Therefore, the president’s involvement in recommending candidates for the National Assembly, which is a member of the legislature in the presidential system, directly violates the constitution’s three-power separation spirit, freedom of political party activities. That logic punished President Park Geun-hye’s intervention in the nomination process, and it was President Yoon Seok-yeol who led the investigation and prosecution, and the U.S., a representative presidential state, has no party leader and no party right to nominate to ensure independent power in such a legislature. It will be elected as a full-fledged citizen election system.
(5)The consultation between the ruling party and the government is that the government consults with the ruling party on policies, not the party consulting with the president on nominations. Even now, such a degree of party-government consultation has been continuously implemented without theory. Since most of the policies are realized through legislation anyway, we seek cooperation and opinions from the ruling party, which is a member of the National Assembly. And that may be called so, but it can also be done with the Opposition. In the U.S., which values independence as a constitutional institution, the president meets with lawmakers in person to seek policy cooperation, as in the IRA Act. It’s very ingenious. Since the president is a member of the party, when did the people force him to consult with the president?
(6)If a lawyer who understands the spirit of the Constitution properly practices free democratic political principles, doesn’t he know that the president’s ruling party and parliamentary rule will legalize the legislature to neutralize the president’s check function and eventually lead to a presidential dictatorship?
(7)02 of Hasida’s
(8)Kim Ki-hyun said, “We will listen to the opinion of President Yoon Suk Yeol on the party nomination.”