(1)”I grabbed his butt”.Seongchu on the subway on the way to work.image text translation
(2)a driven man
(3)Cho Sung-shin, Maekyung Dotcom reporter Robgud mkkokr input 20232132148
(1)Text summary bot ②image text translation
(2)Summarized by automatic extraction technology. Due to the nature of the summary technology, the main contents of the text may be excluded, so it is recommended to view the entire body of the article in order to understand the entire context.
(3)”I grabbed his butt.A man who was accused of sexual harassment in the crowded subway on his way to work.
(4)A man who was brought to trial as a molester on a subway full of passengers on his way to work has been acquitted after more than two years of legal wrangling.
(5)The court dismissed the prosecution’s appeal and acquitted Mr. A.
(6)The court explained the reason for his innocence that he could not convict A with speculative statements by the victim B at a time when it was difficult to rule out the possibility that someone other than A touched B’s buttocks.
(1)Summary of articlesimage text translation
(2)On the morning of November 2020, someone grabbed the butt of a woman getting off the subway.
(3)2 He immediately turned his head and pointed out the man behind him as the culprit.
(4)3 The woman caught the man to protest, but the man got off the subway, so she followed him, caught him, and called the police.
(5)4 In a police investigation, the woman stated that the man was the closest when she looked back right after someone touched her butt, and that the only person to touch was the man because there were not many passengers.
(6)5 The man stated that he always used the subway with glasses in his jacket pocket because he was afraid of steaming because of the mask, holding a cell phone in his left hand, and attaching his right hand to his chest to protect the glasses, and that he had never touched the woman’s butt.
(7)6 When a woman asked me why I just got off when I caught her,
(8)I thought I was being pushed because there were so many people getting off. I didn’t think anyone was holding me. I couldn’t even hear a woman because I was wearing wireless earphones.
(9)7 CCTV confirmed that there were no scenes of harassment inside the subway, but only the situation was taken at the time of getting off, but unlike the woman’s statement that there were not many passengers, passengers were seen rushing down.
(10)During the 81st trial, the woman’s statements suddenly changed, which was quiet. → There were a lot of people.Even so, state that the man felt as if he had touched his butt.
(11)As a result of the 91st trial, the man was acquitted, saying that a person other than the man could have touched it.
(12)10 The prosecution appealed, saying that the woman’s statement was specific and consistent, while the man’s statement was only an unreliable excuse.
(13)As a result of the 112th trial, the prosecution’s appeal was dismissed and the man was acquitted again.
(14)12 The court explained the reason for the innocence that it was impossible to convict the man due to speculative statements of the victim woman in a situation where it was difficult to rule out the possibility that someone other than the man touched the woman’s butt.
(15)13 Finally, the prosecution abandoned the appeal, proving the man’s innocence in two years.
httpsnnewsnavercommnewsarticle0090005087920sid=102