Filter by Category




The crazy Sanggannam kid case is so annoying.jpg

0
(0)

0

image text translation

(1)President of the case, today’s picture 3.
(2)Chungju 44958
(3)JTBC’s wife said she didn’t take the baby with her husband. Child abandonment.
(4)Reported husband, JTBC case leader
(5)JTBC News · 310,000 views · 1 day before

This case, which is all over the commons.

image text translation

(1)Article 844 Presumption of Husband’s biological child
(2)① A child who is pregnant while his wife is married is presumed to be the child of his husband.
(3)② A child born 200 days after the marriage is established is presumed to be pregnant during the marriage.
(4)③ A child born within 300 days of the termination of the marriage is presumed to be pregnant during the marriage.

Article 844 of the Civil Code. That’s why I’m asking for birth registration.

No, the genetic test revealed a paternity mismatch.

Then I assume this is resolved.

How long are you going to estimate it lol

And the gene says it’s someone else’s child.

Isn’t it rather a crime of kidnapping if you take a child?

It’s a story that’s like J no matter how I look at it.

image text translation

(1)Article 844 of the Baffle Civil Code The child pregnant during the wife’s marriage is the husband.
(2)You keep telling me that you’re supposed to be someone’s child, but after the genetic test, it turns out that you’re not a biological child, but I don’t know why it’s still presumed. Also, from the standpoint of raising a child, will he be happy if he comes to my house for his sake?
(3)2302081521 Report
(4)Answer, comment.

(Crying)

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Leave a Comment