[wd_asp elements='search' id=11]

Honestly, even if it was designed for earthquake resistance, it wouldn’t have lasted at 78 JPG.

()

Honestly, even if it was designed for earthquake resistance, it wouldn't have lasted at 78 JPG.

image text translation

Honestly, even if it was designed for earthquake resistance, it wouldn't have lasted at 78 JPG.

image text translation

(1)Google Translation from Turkish
(2)Maras TMMOB Civil Engineers Conference Building
(3)The glass is not broken. Employee
(4)434 p.m., February 10, 2023, 22.79 million views

You build it like that. We’ll live with earthquake resistance.

Honestly, even if it was designed for earthquake resistance, it wouldn't have lasted at 78 JPG.
image text translation

(1)Someone said we’re the 6th standard.
(2)This may be controversial, but the cost of earthquake-resistant design is so high that it would be difficult to install 1,550 earthquakes in countries that are more than 7 in intensity once a thousand years.
(3)They’re building earthquake-resistant buildings. I don’t know about houses.
(4)It will be important whether it works properly even if it is built for embezzlement and corruption.
(5)I’m just wondering if there’s a seismic design for magnitude 6.
(6)There’s a site that tells you how long each house lasts, but I know it’s designed to last from 10 years to 6 years, but it’s a matter of trust.
(7)It’s a little different, but I know that Korea also experienced an earthquake once and is no longer giving permission to Pilot-style buildings.
(8)I thought there was a 7 earthquake 400 years ago.
(9)Our company’s earthquake-resistant building has been built for 10 years, but I can’t believe it because it’s earthquake-resistant, terrible, rain-like, waterproof, and waterproof.
(10)I’m sure you’ve paid a lot of attention to this area since the earthquake in Gyeongju, Pohang, 10 years ago.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Leave a Comment