Innocent vs. 800 won guilty. The people need a law that can judge.

(1)800 won guilty vs 5 billion won innocent” law
(2)”We Are Abandoned” Criticism
(3)Jungkyu Lee Input 2023211 2015 Modified 20232112125

(1)5 billion won pointed out as the target of political lobbying by the Daejang-dong group.
(2)Criticism is brewing over the court’s ruling, which came out for the first time in relation to the club. Kwak Sang-do, a former lawmaker of the People’s Power who was accused of taking billions of won in bribes from his son’s retirement fund, was acquitted, and a banner saying Kwak Sang-do’s son is innocent <800 won guilty of bus driver> was hung at the Ulsan court intersection on the 11th.

(1)Oh Seok-joon 61, the 19th Supreme Court Justice of the Judicial Research and Training Institute, December 2011
(2)The disposition of the express bus company, which dismissed a bus driver who embezzled 800 won while serving as the chief justice of the Seoul Administrative Court, was justified. Justice Oh said the dismissal was justified based on the fact that “the labor-management agreement stipulates that the driver’s income should be stolen in principle regardless of the amount.”
(3)Meanwhile, Lee Jun-cheol, the Seoul Central District Court’s 22nd Criminal Justice, acquitted former lawmaker Kwak of bribery charges for violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes and bribery charges for specific economic crimes. The court ruled, “Considering that there are no circumstances that can be considered to have been paid to former lawmaker Kwak even some of his son’s performance-based bonuses, it cannot be said that former lawmaker Kwak received them himself.”