(1)First of all, there was a controversy because AIG recently sent an official letter that the intentional damage was an insurance fraud.
image text translation
(2)After sending the official letter, even before you upload the video,
(3)I wrote it, but now I’m going to delete it. Now, it’s uploaded a video, and the public debate is…
(4)Basically, insurance should not be subject to VAT.But Akepple charges VAT.
(5)If Akepple is an insurance policy, it’s a violation of the Insurance Business Act.
(6)However, Apple stated in its parliamentary audit that Akepple was a simple integrated service product, not an insurance product.Below are related articles.
(7)Earlier in the day, Apple claimed in a parliamentary audit that Apple Care Plus is not an insurance product, saying it is an integrated service product that provides extended warranty period for electronic products, accidental damage compensation, and priority technical support. Citing the interpretation of the National Tax Service’s laws, he expressed his position that there is no problem in imposing VAT.
(1)If Apple Care Plus isn’t an insurance product,
image text translation
(2)Insurance fraud does not apply to the act of repairing after intentional damage.
(3)Of course, intentional damage and repair is a violation of Apple’s policy, but it is not an insurance product, but insurance fraud is not applied just because it is violated.
(4)If someone is punished for insurance fraud, Apple should return VAT to Apple users.
(5)I think this is not a matter for AIG to do everything about insurance fraud against consumers, but Apple and the insurance company have different opinions, so I think it is a matter for Apple and the insurance company.
(6)If Apple reverses Apple Care Plus as an insurance product
(7)If you admit it, it’s a perjury charge of the parliamentary audit.
(8)Apple refused to repair it for all sorts of reasons.
(9)If we didn’t provide the service, what would it be?
(10)Did the act of intentional damage become this serious?
(11)Have a good holiday and happy new year.
image text translation
1 Apple receives VAT, saying Apple Care is a service, not insurance, and insurance violates the Insurance Business Act if it receives VAT.
2 But AIG said it would report it as an insurance fraud if it received Apple Care after intentional damage.
3 If a consumer is reported as an insurance fraud, Apple will be punished for perjury in the parliamentary audit. LOL
Apple, AIG, and Apple Care have different positions.
Source Asamo
Asamo, the cat, is also cursing Apple lol.