Filter by Category




a strange division of property

0
(0)

image text translation

(1)Subscribe to Kookmin Ilbo.
(2)an apartment one’s been arranged by my husband at the time of marriage.
(3)Will the divorce split the property?
(4)Input 20230114 AM 406 Modification 20230114 AM 825
(5)Reporter Lee Hyung-min.
(6)one house ⑤
(7)The biggest issue in divorce proceedings ‘Special property’
(8)Getty ImagesBank
(9)Mrs. A and Ms. B have maintained a de facto marriage relationship for about five years. However, when the relationship broke down in the summer of 2018, Mr. A filed a lawsuit against Mr. B to destroy the fact and split the property. Two apartments in the Seoul metropolitan area under Mr. B’s name became an issue. Mr. B claimed that the two houses were unique assets formed by himself. The court rejected this claim and judged the two houses as joint property of Mr. A and Mr. B. However, at the time of the lawsuit, B decided to pay 200 million won to A, believing that the right to sell, not the ownership of the house, should be subject to property division because it was before the completion of the apartment.
(10)a court that rejects claims of distinctive property
(11)The meaning of the unfamiliar term “special property” is easy to understand when you think of the opposite. The opposite of special property is joint property. Most divorce proceedings eventually flow to how far exclusive property can be viewed as joint property, a senior judge said on the 13th, “Special property becomes an issue in more than 90 divorce suits.”
(12)In this case, the court has recognized the contribution of household labor to the special property as the longer the marriage period is, the more the property there is no divisible property other than the special property. In the late 2000s, it became a rule to recognize the contribution of one side of the couple in charge of housework in the 40th level in the unique property recognized as a common property.
(13)In a lawsuit filed by C, a housewife who has been married for 30 years, the issue was whether D could view the redevelopment compensation of the land he had before marriage and his retirement pension as a joint property. The compensation rate was set at C 45 D 55 and the pension was set at C 40 D 60. Ashes
(14)Social security and supportive functions of property division are also factors to consider. E spent most of his 20-year marriage abroad. During that period, his wife, Mr. F, was practically in charge of supporting the childcare and housework families. When the marriage ended, Mr. F’s property
(15)It was only about 10 million won. The court will split 900 million won, including the property owned by Mr. E.
(16)back
(17)Reportedly, the rate was set at 60 F 40 for E. But the stars…
(18)Mr. F in the case of the apartment Mr. E inherited from his parents just before.
(19)I ruled out a person’s abandonment of his property, saying I couldn’t accept it.Ji

!

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Leave a Comment