(0)I am
who purchased off-white dunk for 6.98 million won on November 29th I got an answer from Cream today Just like before, there was no legal problem with the
creamHe said he was not involved only because it was a matter between the seller and the buyerThe seller’s input of the amount itself was a reasonable act, but it was an answer that there was no problem The market price is also said to be not involved, but as far as I know, it was canceled, but I couldn’t understand this Also, in the past, he used to sanction this kind of behavior When I inquired, then, is there no problem if I trade a 100,000 won note for 10 million won? When I inquired, I avoided answering that there was no problem with my transaction, but I could not answer the contents I think there will be a lot of people who play cards in the future. Finally, I knew that cream was not guilty from the beginning. I knew it, but I thought it was morally responsible, but the result was a little
(1)It was a shame. The cream itself is not a seller, but a relay, so it seems to be evading all the laws I haven’t received an answer from the Fair Trade Commission or the Consumer Protection Center yet, but I don’t think there’s a solution to the cream I also know that Cream has been concerned about contacting the seller and asking him to consider cancellation Individual employees are not guiltyIt’s company policy and regulations, but I was looking into the news report because they told me to
, but I already got a call Thank you for your concern and help I won’t leave any additional answers Stay healthy
!