1. This apartment was sold in 2016 and now residents have lived in it for over a year.
>
2>. Recently, the apartment’s implementer has sent out a proof that they only received 10% of depreciation from the sale price.Br>5.2 Clause 2 of the Housing Act is the basis of the law, which does not protect third parties in good faith and allows them to cancel contracts at their disposal. Other builders did not file a lawsuit against residents even if the illegal subscription was revealed.”Br.”
8> Even though the house was sold normally according to the results of this trial, anyone whose house was initially contracted for a fraudulent subscription could be taken away from the contractors.