Criticism of those who replace partial facts with whole facts,
Respect for and need for diversity,
Differences in perspective referring to forests and trees,
It is difficult to accept multiple factors such as causal relationships and background at once.
Because it is so complex, I thought it was quite insightful that one thing was brought to the fore.
In particular, the fact that your perspective changes depending on where you are currently standing was an idea that I considered important enough to write down in a space like my profile since I was young.
I even got the feeling that ChatGPty knew my tastes well.
I wanted to talk about the blind spots and perspectives that are missed when looking at an issue in detail like a magnifying glass.
Two perspectives are needed, looking at the tree from a close distance and at the same time looking at the sum of the trees from a distance, and not only in terms of perspective but also in terms of judgment materials, a relative evaluation is needed by weighing two things on a two-arm scale rather than judging from just one thing.
After using it for the first time, I felt many things.
Like this
I decided to write a review saying it was a user experience.
I apologize for any inconvenience caused to those who felt this was a piece of shit philosophy, and thank you for reading my short article.
p.s. My first order was a mistake because I went in to get an image, but after receiving the image and reading the ChatGP answer later, I was intrigued and brought it back. I think some people will make fun of me and ask if this is my first time using AI. I feel like a bit of a caveman haha.