Confirmed.
Also, you gave your opinion about the light part.
I don’t know, but if you pointed out the difference in the light,
There was a gap from the beginning, and it was bound to happen again in the end.
You mentioned that it seems like a chronic disease.
The scratches are original and have been since the car was sold.
It is unknown whether the light has changed, but there is no information about the light.
You remembered the content exactly.
Although this vehicle was purchased additionally, it is kept as a collection.
From the perspective of someone who took care of me with great care, even thinking about staying with me.
From your perspective, the lower part of the bumper, which was pointed out as a bump accident,
Is it true that the damage was caused by this accident?
In response to the question, he expressed a very strong negative by saying, “I can’t do that.”
You said this on the phone, and only with caution while driving this vehicle.
When asked if it is a vehicle that can be driven without scratches on the lower part of the bumper, they responded that it was nonsense and that it was a vehicle that always got scratched.
It was delivered.
This is a photo of scratches on the lower part of the car bumper that have been accumulated for two years.
-2. The incident is scheduled to be broadcast on JTBC Hanvely in late December or early January.
Yesterday, Tuesday, it was selected for broadcast on YouTube’s Hanmuncheol TV.
It has been broadcast. Afterwards, the broadcast of the incident ended with a brief summary, and I, too, felt a little disappointed.
Reply to incident posts that have already ended broadcasting
There was a text message from Mooncheol Han asking me to check it.
I’m here. As a result of confirmation, lawyer Muncheol Han left a comment.
Is the borrower still requesting a large amount of compensation related to my service?
What is the insurance company’s position?
It is scheduled to be covered on JTBC Hanbly from late December to early January.
The author left a message saying he would be in touch.
I contacted the writer and decided that the content was worthy of being broadcast.
If it is determined that there is, it will be made more publicly known than now.
More information has been added since the initial report.
So, you can hear a more clear opinion from Attorney Muncheol Han.
I think there will be.
-3. Contact with the industrial company mentioned by the current car owner
(Actually, out of frustration, I gave the company information to the car owner.
When I heard about it, I thought about contacting them directly.
But maybe I heard about it
The industrial company contacted me first and expressed their position.
The part I waited for, thinking it would be better for you to do it
But then I got a call with strange content.
This is the part shown.)
In fact, this is a kick. It explains the entire incident and all the suspicions.
It’s reversible. It’s shocking content.
You have been contacted by an insurance company representative.
The industrial company accused the insurance company and me of defamation.
He said he contacted me to ask a question,
The insurance company will contact industry officials for details.
The result of what was exchanged is
The owner of the car texted me exactly what he said.
The industrial company has never provided an estimate for this vehicle.
I have never contacted the owner or seen this vehicle.
This is somewhat shocking information.
In the end, according to the claims of industry officials,
This car owner has never visited the mentioned industrial company.
In addition, he made false statements without ever receiving a repair estimate.
The repair estimate was notified verbally to the insurance company representative.
Even in the conversation with me
(My main job is in the sales department of a small and medium-sized manufacturing company. Due to the nature of my work, calls are always automatically recorded.)
20 to 30 million won and headlight parts
He said it was an estimate given by an industrial company and that he did not know.
You said it.
Strictly speaking, I haven’t even properly filed an insurance claim yet.
Of course, insurance benefits were not paid, and it was not insurance fraud.
Insurance fraud attempt
In the end, the industrial company mentioned by this car owner suffered reputational damages.
A false estimate is made not to the insurance company or me, but to the owner of the car.
The reason for changing the target is to create a malicious company that was given away.
It turned out to be the right situation.
Thanks to the many people who helped me late at night, I have provided as much information as possible.
As I collected it, the article became longer.
Today again, due to the incident, I can’t go to my side job.
It’s done.
If there is additional information collected, we will continue to collect it.
I’m planning to come and see, and I expect that the owner of the car is still dealing with this situation.
My personal opinion is that you don’t seem to understand.
Yesterday, when I requested a photo of the accident area, they proudly sent it to me.
I asked for a quotation and the response was that it was being requested.
There is still no contact from both sides, but if you have figured out the situation,
I’m sure you have something to say to apologize to me.
There is no action.
Anyway, thank you for reading this long post at such a late hour and for your interest.
Thank you.