1. Insurance company calls driver at fault 7-80
2. After reporting to Han Moon-cheol TV, lawyer Han Moon-cheol ruled that the driver was not at fault and appealed to the insurance company.
3. The insurance company plans to process the right to indemnification after paying the pedestrian’s medical expenses in advance.
4. Pedestrian reports driver to police
5. The pedestrian’s current condition is complaining of ankle pain and knee fracture, and has been assessed as level 12.
6. The police tried to handle the driver’s violation of safe driving obligations, but suddenly postponed the investigation by saying they would request a professional analysis agency. It is still an ongoing case, but even in car-to-person accidents, the number of cases in which the car is unconditionally more at fault seems to be decreasing. I hope that more cases like this will be created so that there will be fewer people who are wronged.