Loyalty of the Chief Justice of the Court, is the appointing authority the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court or the Constitution? -Attorney Kyeong-ho Kim-

Lawyer Kim Kyung-ho TV
9 hours ago
Caleb) Loyalty of the chief judge, is the appointing authority Cho Hee-dae or the current law?
Seoul High Court Chief Justice Kim Dae-um and Seoul Central District Court Chief Justice Oh Min-seok stood at the State Audit Office yesterday.
The answer seems to be pressing the crisis frame of the judiciary in the Republic of Korea: it is a matter of law and conscience.
No, it was a blatant look at Supreme Court Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae, who holds personnel authority:
The record winning and court allocation process in President Lee Jae-myung’s case was the height of abnormality:
The day after the Supreme Court ruling, the records were moved to the abolished paper, and dividends were distributed (trial date in about an hour)
Designation and appointment of executive officer Jong-dal are completed: ‘It was like eating beans in a lightning fire’
Even Chief Justice Kim Dae-um admitted that he “understands” the public’s questions about the procedure: Inon
Previously, Cho Hee-dae’s Supreme Court violated the right to adjudication and was suspected of pre-trial.
It is an extension of the unjustified ruling that was forced upon the court: the judicial process is a political process that does not deliver justice.
They will be mobilized for the following purposes:
What is even more shocking is the attitude of Chief Justice Oh Min-seok: Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae
He became a symbol of preferential treatment after being promoted directly from the position of Chief Trial Researcher and became a symbol of the illegality of insurance.
He avoided giving a direct answer to the question of whether or not he should: Even the illegality of Gyeim, which is the basis of the current government order, was avoided.
The reality is that people who are not confident are in charge of important cases and warrants related to civil war.
It’s a disaster: It’s not the judiciary’s deliberation, but opportunistic behavior according to the direction of power.
Only:
The independence of the judiciary means independence not only from external power but also from internal power such as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
Includes: However, for today’s high-ranking judges, it goes beyond the appointing authority, such as Colonel Park Jeong-hoon.
The ability to be loyal to the current law and the people is not visible and is not heard: only to the person who appointed him or her.
There is only objective loyalty to:
This demonstrates a fundamental flaw in the current judicial appointment system: all state power
We must restore the spirit of making current laws that come from the people: in the process of appointing high-ranking judges
We need to involve an external personnel framework to elect people who will be loyal to the people and the current law: Also,
In accordance with the Sineonseopan (Bokreumchulsu), the judgments and statements are made public at all times to ensure that their qualifications are verified.
We must let the people verify it themselves: there is no reason for the judiciary to exist if it serves power:
Now is the time to return the call of justice to the people:
1025.
I0.
1
Attorney Kyeong-ho Kim